Suppr超能文献

异氟烷、地氟烷和丙泊酚麻醉期间的动态和静态脑自动调节

Dynamic and static cerebral autoregulation during isoflurane, desflurane, and propofol anesthesia.

作者信息

Strebel S, Lam A M, Matta B, Mayberg T S, Aaslid R, Newell D W

机构信息

Departments of Anesthesiology and Neurological Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.

出版信息

Anesthesiology. 1995 Jul;83(1):66-76. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199507000-00008.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although inhalation anesthetic agents are thought to impair cerebral autoregulation more than intravenous agents, there are few controlled studies in humans.

METHODS

In the first group (n = 24), dynamic autoregulation was assessed from the response of middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (Vmca) to a transient step decrease in mean arterial blood pressure (MABP). The transient hypotension was induced by rapid deflation of thigh cuffs after inflation for 3 min. In the second group (n = 18), static autoregulation was studied by observing Vmca in response to a phenylephrine-induced increase in MABP. All patients were studied during fentanyl (3 micrograms.kg-1.h-1)/nitrous oxide (70%) anesthesia, followed by, in a randomized manner, isoflurane, desflurane, or propofol in a low dose (0.5 MAC or 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) and a high dose (1.5 MAC or 200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1). The dynamic rate of regulation (dROR) was assessed from the rate of change in cerebrovascular resistance (MABP/Vmca) with the blood pressure decreases using computer modeling, whereas the static rate of regulation (sROR) was assessed from the change in Vmca with the change in MABP.

RESULTS

Low-dose isoflurane delayed (dROR decreased) but did not reduce the autoregulatory response (sROR intact). Low-dose desflurane decreased both dROR and sROR. During 1.5 MAC isoflurane or desflurane, autoregulation was ablated (both dROR and sROR impaired). Neither dROR nor sROR changed with low- or high-dose propofol.

CONCLUSIONS

At 1.5 MAC, isoflurane and desflurane impaired autoregulation whereas propofol (200 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) preserved it.

摘要

背景

尽管吸入麻醉药被认为比静脉麻醉药更易损害脑自动调节功能,但在人体中进行的对照研究较少。

方法

在第一组(n = 24)中,通过大脑中动脉血流速度(Vmca)对平均动脉血压(MABP)短暂阶跃下降的反应来评估动态自动调节功能。短暂性低血压是通过将大腿袖带充气3分钟后快速放气诱导产生的。在第二组(n = 18)中,通过观察Vmca对去氧肾上腺素诱导的MABP升高的反应来研究静态自动调节功能。所有患者均在芬太尼(3微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹)/氧化亚氮(70%)麻醉期间接受研究,随后随机给予低剂量(0.5MAC或100微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)和高剂量(1.5MAC或200微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)的异氟烷、地氟烷或丙泊酚。使用计算机模型根据血压下降时脑血管阻力(MABP/Vmca)的变化率评估动态调节率(dROR),而根据Vmca随MABP的变化评估静态调节率(sROR)。

结果

低剂量异氟烷延迟了(dROR降低)但未降低自动调节反应(sROR完整)。低剂量地氟烷降低了dROR和sROR。在1.5MAC异氟烷或地氟烷期间,自动调节功能被消除(dROR和sROR均受损)。低剂量或高剂量丙泊酚均未改变dROR和sROR。

结论

在1.5MAC时,异氟烷和地氟烷损害自动调节功能,而丙泊酚(200微克·千克⁻¹·分钟⁻¹)可保留该功能。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验