Furlong R, Gerhardt R T, Farber P, Schrank K, Willig R, Pittaluga J
Emergency Medicine Section, University of Miami School of Medicine, FL, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 Jul;13(4):383-8. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90119-1.
This study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intravenous adenosine therapy for prehospital treatment of narrow-complex tachycardias with a presumptive field diagnosis of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) by paramedics without direct physician control. A ten-month prospective case series was designed in an urban EMS system that has paramedics operating under standing orders before physician radio contact. All patients with PSVT field diagnosis were included. Diagnosis of PSVT was made by regular, narrow-complex tachycardia with a heart rate greater than 160 beats/min by field ECG. Interpretation was performed solely by paramedics; ECG transmission was not available. In hemodynamically stable patients, vagal maneuvers were followed by intravenous placement and administration of adenosine was recommended by the manufacturer. If three adenosine boluses failed to convert the arrhythmia, patients were monitored and transported, with electrical cardioversion available. Data collection included demographic, history, medications, vital signs, and EGG tracings. Of 14 included patients, 31 were correctly diagnosed with PSVT (75.6%), with mean ventricular rate of 205 beats/min (SD 7 beats/min); one had sinus tachycardia; nine had atrial fibrillation (AF) (22%). Of the 31 cases correctly diagnosed as PSVT, 28 converted to sinus rhythm after adenosine (90.3%). Of those converted, 16 required a single dose (57.1%), nine required one additional dose (32.1%), and three required two additional doses (10.8%). None reverted to PSVT after adenosine conversion during the study period (conversion to arrival at emergency department). No significant difference in length of asystolic pause or in outcome was detected between the true PSVT cases and the AF cases receiving adenosine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
本研究旨在评估在没有医生直接指导的情况下,护理人员对疑似阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)的窄QRS波心动过速进行院前静脉注射腺苷治疗的安全性和有效性。在一个城市急救医疗服务(EMS)系统中设计了一项为期十个月的前瞻性病例系列研究,该系统的护理人员在与医生进行无线电联系之前按照既定医嘱操作。所有现场诊断为PSVT的患者均被纳入。PSVT的诊断依据是现场心电图显示规则、窄QRS波心动过速且心率大于160次/分钟。仅由护理人员进行解读;无法进行心电图传输。对于血流动力学稳定的患者,先进行迷走神经手法操作,然后建立静脉通路,按照制造商的建议给予腺苷。如果三次腺苷推注未能转复心律失常,则对患者进行监测并转运,可进行电复律。数据收集包括人口统计学、病史、用药情况、生命体征和心电图记录。在纳入的14例患者中,31例被正确诊断为PSVT(75.6%),平均心室率为205次/分钟(标准差7次/分钟);1例为窦性心动过速;9例为心房颤动(AF)(22%)。在31例被正确诊断为PSVT的病例中,28例在使用腺苷后转复为窦性心律(90.3%)。在转复的患者中,16例需要单次给药(57.1%),9例需要额外一次给药(32.1%),3例需要额外两次给药(10.8%)。在研究期间(从转复到抵达急诊科),腺苷转复后无患者再发PSVT。接受腺苷治疗的真正PSVT病例和AF病例之间,在心脏停搏期时长或结局方面未检测到显著差异。(摘要截选至250字)