• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[原发灶不明的颈部淋巴结转移瘤。58例患者的随访]

[Cervical lymph node metastases in unknown primary tumor. Follow-up of 58 patients].

作者信息

Subramanian R, Chilla R

机构信息

HNO-Klinik, Zentralkrankenhaus St. -Jürgen-Strasse, Bremen.

出版信息

HNO. 1995 May;43(5):299-303.

PMID:7607915
Abstract

Fifty-eight patients presenting with lymph node metastases of the head and neck were treated at the Bremen ENT Clinic from 1970 to 1988. In none of the patients could a primary tumor be detected despite extensive diagnostic procedures. The 5-year survival rate was 26.3%. During the further course of the disease, six primary tumors were detected in the following areas: nasopharynx (2 cases), soft palate, oesophagus, bronchi and kidney. Prognosis decreased with increasing tumor stages, although histological grading had no influence on prognosis. Supraclavicular localization and male sex were high risk factors. Prognosis was also not improved when ampiric irradiation also included the pharynx as a possible site of the primary tumor.

摘要

1970年至1988年期间,不来梅耳鼻喉诊所对58例出现头颈部淋巴结转移的患者进行了治疗。尽管进行了广泛的诊断程序,但在这些患者中均未检测到原发肿瘤。5年生存率为26.3%。在疾病的进一步发展过程中,在以下部位检测到6例原发肿瘤:鼻咽(2例)、软腭、食管、支气管和肾脏。尽管组织学分级对预后没有影响,但预后随着肿瘤分期的增加而降低。锁骨上淋巴结定位和男性是高危因素。当经验性放疗也将咽部作为原发肿瘤的可能部位时,预后也没有改善。

相似文献

1
[Cervical lymph node metastases in unknown primary tumor. Follow-up of 58 patients].[原发灶不明的颈部淋巴结转移瘤。58例患者的随访]
HNO. 1995 May;43(5):299-303.
2
[Lymph node metastases in the neck of unknown primary tumor].[不明原发肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移]
Laryngorhinootologie. 2000 Aug;79(8):483-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-5909.
3
[Neck metastases from an unknown primary tumor].
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1990 Mar 30;110(9):1099-102.
4
Diagnostic work-up and outcome of cervical metastases from an unknown primary.不明原发灶颈部转移瘤的诊断检查及预后
Acta Otolaryngol. 2006 May;126(5):536-44. doi: 10.1080/00016480500417304.
5
Neck lymph node metastases from an unknown primary tumor retrospective study and review of literature.不明原发肿瘤颈部淋巴结转移的回顾性研究及文献综述
Strahlenther Onkol. 2005 Jun;181(6):355-62. doi: 10.1007/s00066-005-1338-2.
6
Diagnostic strategies in cervical carcinoma of an unknown primary (CUP).原发灶不明的宫颈癌(CUP)的诊断策略。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2002 Jul;259(6):325-33. doi: 10.1007/s00405-002-0470-1. Epub 2002 May 1.
7
[Diagnosis and treatment of 39 patients with cervical lymph node metastases of squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary origin, referred to Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, 1979-98].[1979年至1998年转诊至荷兰癌症研究所/安托尼·范·列文虎克医院的39例原发灶不明的鳞状细胞癌颈部淋巴结转移患者的诊断与治疗]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2000 Jul 8;144(28):1355-60.
8
Carcinoma metastatic to cervical lymph nodes from an occult primary tumor: the outcome after combined-modality therapy.隐匿性原发肿瘤转移至颈部淋巴结的癌:综合治疗后的结局
Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 May;14(5):1575-82. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9329-9. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
9
[Malignant cervical adenopathies of unknown origin].[不明来源的恶性宫颈淋巴结病]
Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 1997 Jun-Jul;48(5):383-5.
10
Combined ipsilateral treatment of cervical lymph nodes metastases from an unknown primary.对原发灶不明的颈部淋巴结转移进行同侧联合治疗。
B-ENT. 2008;4(3):157-61.

引用本文的文献

1
Diagnosis and management of carcinoma of unknown primary in the head and neck.头颈部原发灶不明癌的诊断与管理
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2003 Sep;260(8):436-43. doi: 10.1007/s00405-003-0585-z. Epub 2003 Apr 9.
2
Lymph node metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma from an unknown primary: impact of positron emission tomography.原发灶不明的鳞状细胞癌的淋巴结转移:正电子发射断层扫描的影响
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2003 Mar;30(3):411-6. doi: 10.1007/s00259-002-1078-9. Epub 2002 Dec 17.
3
[Therapy pf cervical lymph node metastases of unknown primary tumor].
[原发灶不明的颈部淋巴结转移瘤的治疗]
Strahlenther Onkol. 1997 Jul;173(7):362-8. doi: 10.1007/BF03038239.