• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.

作者信息

Boland M A, Foster K A, Schinckel A P, Wagner J, Chen W, Berg E P, Forrest J C

机构信息

Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.

出版信息

J Anim Sci. 1995 Mar;73(3):637-44. doi: 10.2527/1995.733637x.

DOI:10.2527/1995.733637x
PMID:7607995
Abstract

Dissected and predicted wholesale and lean boneless values for 154 pork carcasses representing seven genotypes with substantial variation in carcass composition and percentage of lean were determined. Dissected carcass value was determined using a component pricing model, and four alternative models were specified to predict that value. The models included measurements from a ruler (RULER) and two carcass evaluation technologies, Hennessy probe (PROBE) and electromagnetic scanner (EMS1). A combination of the PROBE and EMS1 models (EMS2) was also used. For wholesale value, R2 were .40, .70, .59, and .74, and the RSD were 8.18, 5.77, 6.76, and 5.38 ($/100 kg of carcass value) for RULER, PROBE, EMS1, and EMS2, respectively. For lean boneless value, the R2 were .41, .73, .59, and .74, and the RSD were 8.34, 5.67, 6.99, and 5.51 ($/100 kg of carcass value) for RULER, PROBE, EMS1, and EMS2, respectively. The results indicate that a combination of probe and electromagnetic scanner measurements provided the best fit to dissected value.

摘要

相似文献

1
Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: I. Differences in predictions of value.
J Anim Sci. 1995 Mar;73(3):637-44. doi: 10.2527/1995.733637x.
2
Alternative pork carcass evaluation techniques: II. Statistical analysis of error attributable to sex, genotype, and weight.猪肉胴体评估的替代技术:II. 性别、基因型和体重导致的误差的统计分析
J Anim Sci. 1995 Mar;73(3):645-50. doi: 10.2527/1995.733645x.
3
Evaluation of alternative techniques to determine pork carcass value.
J Anim Sci. 1992 Jan;70(1):18-28. doi: 10.2527/1992.70118x.
4
Electromagnetic scanning of pork carcasses in an on-line industrial configuration.在线工业配置下对猪胴体进行电磁扫描。
J Anim Sci. 1994 Oct;72(10):2642-52. doi: 10.2527/1994.72102642x.
5
Evaluation of electronic technology to assess lamb carcass composition.评估用于评估羔羊胴体组成的电子技术。
J Anim Sci. 1997 Sep;75(9):2433-44. doi: 10.2527/1997.7592433x.
6
Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.利用当前的在线胴体评估参数,评估修整水平对去骨和带骨猪肉胴体产量的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1999 Aug;77(8):1977-84. doi: 10.2527/1999.7781977x.
7
Evaluation of the E+V video image analysis system as a predictor of pork carcass meat yield.评估E+V视频图像分析系统作为猪肉胴体产肉量预测指标的性能。
J Anim Sci. 2003 May;81(5):1193-201. doi: 10.2527/2003.8151193x.
8
Biases associated with genotype and sex in prediction of fat-free lean mass and carcass value in hogs.
J Anim Sci. 1998 Sep;76(9):2221-34. doi: 10.2527/1998.7692221x.
9
Influence of slaughter weight on growth and carcass characteristics, commercial cutting and curing yields, and meat quality of barrows and gilts from two genotypes.屠宰体重对两种基因型公猪和母猪生长性能、胴体特性、商业分割与腌制产量以及肉质的影响。
J Anim Sci. 1996 May;74(5):925-33. doi: 10.2527/1996.745925x.
10
Evaluation of alternative measures of pork carcass composition.猪胴体组成替代测量方法的评估。
J Anim Sci. 2001 May;79(5):1093-119. doi: 10.2527/2001.7951093x.