• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利伐他汀与华法林之间不存在药代动力学或药效学相互作用。

No pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between rivastatin and warfarin.

作者信息

Schall R, Müller F O, Hundt H K, Ritter W, Duursema L, Groenewoud G, Middle M V

机构信息

FARMOVS Institute for Clinical Pharmacology and Drug Development, Department of Pharmacology, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, Republic of South Africa.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;35(3):306-13. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04065.x.

DOI:10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04065.x
PMID:7608323
Abstract

Twenty-one healthy, male volunteers completed this double-blind, randomized, two-period, crossover study to determine the possible pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction of the concomitant administration of rivastatin and warfarin sodium in healthy volunteers. The study comprised 2 treatment periods of 8 days each, with a medication-free period of 14 days between the 2 treatment periods. According to the randomization, the volunteers received either 300 micrograms of rivastatin or matching placebo once daily during the treatment periods. On day 4 of each treatment period, the volunteers also received a single oral dose of 25 mg of warfarin sodium together with rivastatin or matching placebo. The effect of rivastatin on both the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (prothrombin time and clotting factor VII activity) of warfarin sodium, and the effect of warfarin sodium on the pharmacokinetics of rivastatin were investigated. Blood sample assays included the analysis of both R- and S-warfarin, because it is known that the enantiomers differ in anticoagulant potency. The study results indicate that the concomitant administration of rivastatin and warfarin does not affect the pharmacokinetics of R- and S-warfarin, or the pharmacodynamics of warfarin. Furthermore, the administration of warfarin sodium does not affect the pharmacokinetics of rivastatin.

摘要

21名健康男性志愿者完成了这项双盲、随机、两阶段交叉研究,以确定在健康志愿者中瑞伐他汀与华法林钠联合给药可能存在的药效学和药代动力学相互作用。该研究包括两个各为期8天的治疗阶段,两个治疗阶段之间有14天的无药期。根据随机分组,志愿者在治疗阶段每天接受一次300微克瑞伐他汀或匹配的安慰剂。在每个治疗阶段的第4天,志愿者还接受一次25毫克华法林钠的口服单剂量给药,同时服用瑞伐他汀或匹配的安慰剂。研究了瑞伐他汀对华法林钠药代动力学和药效学(凝血酶原时间和凝血因子VII活性)的影响,以及华法林钠对瑞伐他汀药代动力学的影响。血样检测包括R-和S-华法林的分析,因为已知对映体的抗凝效力不同。研究结果表明,瑞伐他汀与华法林联合给药不影响R-和S-华法林的药代动力学,也不影响华法林的药效学。此外,华法林钠的给药不影响瑞伐他汀的药代动力学。

相似文献

1
No pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction between rivastatin and warfarin.利伐他汀与华法林之间不存在药代动力学或药效学相互作用。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Mar;35(3):306-13. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04065.x.
2
Study of the effect of miglitol on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy males.米格列醇对健康男性华法林药代动力学和药效学影响的研究。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1996 Jan;46(1):41-6.
3
The effect of anastrozole on the single-dose pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant activity of warfarin in healthy volunteers.阿那曲唑对健康志愿者中华法林单剂量药代动力学及抗凝活性的影响。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 May;51(5):429-35. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.01358.x.
4
Losartan does not affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin.氯沙坦不影响华法林的药代动力学和药效学。
J Clin Pharmacol. 1995 Oct;35(10):1008-15. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1995.tb04018.x.
5
No effect of the novel antidiabetic agent nateglinide on the pharmacokinetics and anticoagulant properties of warfarin in healthy volunteers.新型抗糖尿病药物那格列奈对健康志愿者华法林的药代动力学及抗凝特性无影响。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2002 Dec;42(12):1358-65. doi: 10.1177/0091270002238772.
6
Lack of effect of repeated administration of levetiracetam on the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic profiles of warfarin.左乙拉西坦重复给药对华法林药效学和药代动力学特征无影响。
Epilepsy Res. 2001 Nov;47(1-2):55-63. doi: 10.1016/s0920-1211(01)00293-5.
7
Absence of an effect of levofloxacin on warfarin pharmacokinetics and anticoagulation in male volunteers.
J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Nov;36(11):1072-7. doi: 10.1177/009127009603601111.
8
Pharmacodynamic evaluation of warfarin and rosuvastatin co-administration in healthy subjects.华法林与瑞舒伐他汀联合给药在健康受试者中的药效学评价。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Oct;61(9):621-5. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0986-6. Epub 2005 Oct 19.
9
Effect of tolterodine on the anticoagulant actions and pharmacokinetics of single-dose warfarin in healthy volunteers.托特罗定对健康志愿者单剂量华法林抗凝作用及药代动力学的影响。
Arzneimittelforschung. 2002;52(12):890-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1299986.
10
The effect of etoricoxib on the pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of warfarin.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 May;47(5):620-7. doi: 10.1177/0091270007299758.

引用本文的文献

1
Protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis: impact of statins as immune-modulatory agents on inflammatory markers in adults with chronic diseases.系统评价和荟萃分析方案:他汀类药物作为免疫调节剂对慢性病成人炎症标志物的影响。
BMJ Open. 2020 Aug 13;10(8):e039034. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039034.
2
Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic drug interactions with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂的药代动力学-药效学药物相互作用
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2002;41(5):343-70. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200241050-00003.
3
Cerivastatin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in the management of hypercholesterolaemia.
西立伐他汀:其药理特性及治疗高胆固醇血症疗效的综述
Drugs. 2000 Nov;60(5):1179-206. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200060050-00011.
4
Clinical pharmacokinetics of cerivastatin.西立伐他汀的临床药代动力学
Clin Pharmacokinet. 2000 Aug;39(2):99-116. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200039020-00002.
5
Rational assessment of the interaction profile of cerivastatin supports its low propensity for drug interactions.对西立伐他汀相互作用特征的合理评估支持其药物相互作用倾向较低。
Drugs. 1998;56 Suppl 1:15-23; discussion 33. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199856001-00003.
6
Inter-ethnic comparisons of the pharmacokinetics of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor cerivastatin.HMG-CoA还原酶抑制剂西立伐他汀药代动力学的种族间比较。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1998 Jun;45(6):583-90. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1998.00717.x.
7
Cerivastatin.西立伐他汀
Drugs. 1998 Mar;55(3):415-20; discussion 421-2. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199855030-00009.