生物伦理学写作中的“伦理差距”：医学文献与外科文献的定量比较
An 'ethics gap' in writing about bioethics: a quantitative comparison of the medical and the surgical literature.
作者信息
Paola F, Barten S S
机构信息
Division of Internal Medicine, Nassau County Medical Center, East Meadow, New York, USA.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):84-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.84.
In order to determine whether there is a significant difference between the medical literature and the surgical literature in terms of their bioethics content, we conducted a computerized search of the MEDLINE database. The journals searched were selected from the 'Medicine' and 'Surgery' sections of the 'Brandon-Hill List', and the search was limited to 1992 issues of these journals. Three hundred and seven bioethics bibliographic records (out of a total of 11,239 articles indexed) were retrieved from the 15 medical journals searched, while 17 bioethics bibliographic records (out of a total of 2,645 articles indexed) were retrieved from the 12 surgical journals searched. We conclude that there is a statistically significant (p < 0.001) difference between the medical literature and the surgical literature with respect to their quantitative bioethics content.
为了确定医学文献和外科文献在生物伦理学内容方面是否存在显著差异，我们对MEDLINE数据库进行了计算机检索。检索的期刊选自《布兰登-希尔期刊列表》的“医学”和“外科”部分，检索范围限定为这些期刊1992年的各期。从所检索的15种医学期刊中检索到307条生物伦理学书目记录（在总共索引的11239篇文章中），而从所检索的12种外科期刊中检索到17条生物伦理学书目记录（在总共索引的2645篇文章中）。我们得出结论，医学文献和外科文献在生物伦理学定量内容方面存在统计学上的显著差异（p < 0.001）。
Zotero 插件