腿部骨折的稻草人：对佩尔·桑德斯特伦的回应。
Straw men with broken legs: a response to Per Sundström.
作者信息
Singer P
机构信息
Centre for Human Bioethics, Monash University, Australia.
出版信息
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):89-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.89.
Abstract
Per Sundström has totally misunderstood what I was trying to do when, in the context of my debate with some German opponents of my views, I referred to their views as implying that if we break a leg, we should not try to get it mended. My brief response corrects this misunderstanding.
摘要
佩尔·松德斯特伦完全误解了我试图做的事情。当时在我与一些反对我观点的德国对手辩论的背景下，我提到他们的观点意味着，如果我们摔断了一条腿，就不应该试图去把它治好。我简短的回应纠正了这种误解。
相似文献
1
Straw men with broken legs: a response to Per Sundström.腿部骨折的稻草人：对佩尔·桑德斯特伦的回应。
J Med Ethics. 1995 Apr;21(2):89-90. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.2.89.
2
Living and dying.生存与死亡。
Psychol Today. 1999 Jan-Feb;32(1):56-59, 78-79.
3
More on euthanasia: a response to Pauer-Studer.更多关于安乐死：对保尔-施图德的回应。
Monist. 1993 Apr;76(2):158-74.
4
Euthanasia.安乐死
Philos Public Aff. 1977 Winter;6(2):85-112.
5
Towards the abolition of man: the voice of disabled persons cannot be ignored.
Bull Med Ethics. 2002 Jan(174):13-21.
6
Infanticide for the handicapped newborn--a secular rejection.对残疾新生儿实施杀婴行为——一种世俗的摒弃。
J Med Ethics. 1988 Dec;14(4):223. doi: 10.1136/jme.14.4.223.
7
Meaning and meaninglessness of the quality of life criterion.生活质量标准的意义与无意义性。
Dolentium Hominum. 1995;10(1):41-3.
8
Academia's "Doctor Death".
Hum Life Rev. 1998 Fall;24(4):34-40.
9
Infant care review committees: their moral responsibilities.
Linacre Q. 1985 Nov;52(4):361-74.
10
Is there a place for active euthanasia in palliative care.
J Palliat Care. 1988 May;4(1 and 2):99-121.
引用本文的文献
1
Can life be evaluated? The Jewish Halachic approach vs. the quality of life approach in medical ethics: a critical view.
Theor Med Bioeth. 2000;21(2):117-37. doi: 10.1023/a:1009971004523.
2
Would Aristotle have played Russian roulette?亚里士多德会玩俄罗斯轮盘赌吗？
J Med Ethics. 1996 Aug;22(4):209-15. doi: 10.1136/jme.22.4.209.
3
Rhetorical devices are of no avail: a rejoinder to Peter Singer.修辞手法无济于事：对彼得·辛格的回应
J Med Ethics. 1995 Oct;21(5):312. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.5.312.
本文引用的文献
1
Peter Singer and 'lives not worth living'--comments on a flawed argument from analogy.彼得·辛格与“不值得过的生活”——评一个有缺陷的类比论证
J Med Ethics. 1995 Feb;21(1):35-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.21.1.35.
Zotero 插件