Schipper I, Senn P, Niesen U
Augenklinik Kantonsspital Luzern.
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1995 May;206(5):322-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1035452.
It is possible that the traditional method to determine the intraocular pressure after excimer-laser PRK is inaccurate. Measuring the pressure in the temporal part of the cornea might give the true values.
Intraocular pressure was measured with a Goldmann Applanation Tonometer and with the Tonopen, before and after PRK for myopia in the central and in the temporal parts of the cornea. The paired student t-test was used for statistical analysis.
The results of central and temporal measurements before treatment were identical with both instruments. After PRK, central values were 2 to 3 mm Hg lower than temporal values when measured with a Goldmann Tonometer, and about 2 mm lower when measured with the Tonopen. The differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.004 respectively).
The intraocular pressure measured in the usual manner after excimer-laser PRK is lower than the temporally measured pressure. These differences could be caused by absence of the Bowman's membrane, thinning of the cornea and/or change of its topography.
准分子激光角膜切削术(PRK)后采用传统方法测量眼压可能不准确。测量角膜颞侧的眼压或许能得出真实值。
在近视PRK术前及术后,使用戈德曼压平眼压计和眼压笔分别测量角膜中央和颞侧的眼压。采用配对学生t检验进行统计分析。
治疗前,两种仪器测量的角膜中央和颞侧结果相同。PRK术后,用戈德曼眼压计测量时,中央值比颞侧值低2至3毫米汞柱,用眼压笔测量时低约2毫米。差异具有高度显著性(分别为p < 0.0001和p = 0.004)。
准分子激光PRK术后按常规方式测量的眼压低于颞侧测量的眼压。这些差异可能是由于Bowman膜缺失、角膜变薄和/或其地形改变所致。