• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Multi-segment ventral stabilization of the lumbar spine: a comparative biomechanical study].

作者信息

Eysel P, Hopf C, Diop A, Lavaste F

机构信息

Orthopädische Universitätsklinik Mainz.

出版信息

Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1995 May-Jun;133(3):242-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039444.

DOI:10.1055/s-2008-1039444
PMID:7610706
Abstract

The stability provided by three anterior spinal fixation devices (VDS, TSRH, CDH) designed for multisegmental instrumentation have been studied in an in-vitro model using L1-L5 sections of six human cadaveric spines for each instrumentation. Three-dimensional measurement of rotation and translation for the intact and instrumented spine under physiological loads in flexion/extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation were determined. After measuring the intact spine the destabilization was performed by complete intersection of the intervertebral disc, all spines were instrumented for 3 segments. TSRH was found to be significantly (p < 0.05) higher in stiffness in flexion/extension and torsion than VDS. In bending there was no statistical difference. In all tests CDH was significantly more stable than VDS. In flexion/extension it proved higher in stiffness than TSRH, no statistical difference was observed in bending and rotation.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Multi-segment ventral stabilization of the lumbar spine: a comparative biomechanical study].
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1995 May-Jun;133(3):242-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1039444.
2
[Biomechanical evaluation of stiffness of long-segment instrumented spine].[长节段器械固定脊柱刚度的生物力学评估]
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao. 2005 Apr;27(2):153-5.
3
Biomechanics of posterior dynamic stabilizing device (DIAM) after facetectomy and discectomy.小关节突切除术和椎间盘切除术后后路动态稳定装置(DIAM)的生物力学
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):714-22. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.02.003.
4
Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.全椎间盘置换人工关节的生物力学评估:体外人体尸体模型
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S110-7. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092209.27573.90.
5
Interbody device endplate engagement effects on motion segment biomechanics.椎间融合器终板接触对运动节段生物力学的影响。
Spine J. 2009 Jul;9(7):564-73. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.014. Epub 2009 May 20.
6
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
7
Augmentation of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with anterior pedicle screw fixation: demonstration of novel constructs and evaluation of biomechanical stability in cadaveric specimens.前路腰椎椎间融合联合前路椎弓根螺钉固定:新型结构的展示及尸体标本生物力学稳定性评估
Neurosurgery. 2006 Mar;58(3):522-7; discussion 522-7. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000197322.52848.C8.
8
Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.两种使用同种异体骨移植和金属植入物进行腰椎椎体切除术的体内手术方法:一项对照临床和生物力学研究。
Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6):648-58. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.028. Epub 2006 Oct 11.
9
Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.用于非融合性脊柱侧弯矫正的楔形棒系统的临床前测试。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Oct 15;28(20):S275-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000092486.61943.99.
10
Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.腰椎前路椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的生物力学比较
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2008 Apr;21(2):120-5. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e318060092f.

引用本文的文献

1
Finite element analysis and cadaveric cinematic analysis of fixation options for anteriorly implanted trabecular metal interbody cages.前路植入小梁金属椎间融合器固定方案的有限元分析及尸体运动学分析
Eur Spine J. 2015 Nov;24 Suppl 7:918-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-4277-3. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
2
[Anterior scoliosis surgery. State of the art and a comparison with posterior techniques].[前路脊柱侧弯手术。技术现状及与后路技术的比较]
Orthopade. 2009 Feb;38(2):131-4, 136-40, 142-5. doi: 10.1007/s00132-008-1365-7.
3
Operative treatment of spondylodiscitis--what is the most effective approach?
脊椎椎间盘炎的手术治疗——最有效的方法是什么?
Neurosurg Rev. 1998;21(4):217-25. doi: 10.1007/BF01105775.
4
Primary stable anterior instrumentation or dorsoventral spondylodesis in spondylodiscitis? Results of a comparative study.脊椎椎间盘炎的一期前路稳定内固定术或前后路脊柱融合术?一项比较研究的结果。
Eur Spine J. 1997;6(3):152-7. doi: 10.1007/BF01301428.
5
CDH: preliminary report on a new anterior spinal instrumentation.先天性髋关节脱位:一种新型前路脊柱内固定器械的初步报告
Eur Spine J. 1995;4(3):194-9. doi: 10.1007/BF00298246.