Rijken A M, Raaymakers E L
Department of Surgery, Academical Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eur J Surg. 1995 Apr;161(4):237-40.
To describe our experience with a modification of the Pirogoff amputation, in the treatment of serious injuries to the hind foot.
Retrospective study.
University hospital, The Netherlands.
Six patients who required amputation of the hind foot after serious injury.
The modified Pirogoff amputation (amputation of the foot at the ankle with part of the calcaneus left in the lower end of the stump) was done four times as an emergency and twice electively between 1979 and 1991.
All the patients were satisfied with their stumps at follow up (7 months-13 years). None had stump pain or phantom pain and they were able to walk about indoors without using the prosthesis.
We recommend the Pirogoff amputation as the treatment of choice in the management of partial traumatic amputation and other injuries of the foot, should a transmetatarsal amputation be impossible and about 5 cm of the sole of the foot can be preserved.
描述我们对皮罗戈夫截肢术进行改良后,用于治疗后足严重损伤的经验。
回顾性研究。
荷兰大学医院。
6例后足严重损伤后需要截肢的患者。
改良皮罗戈夫截肢术(在踝关节处截肢,残端下端保留部分跟骨)在1979年至1991年间作为急诊进行了4次,择期进行了2次。
随访(7个月至13年)时所有患者对其残端均满意。无一例有残端疼痛或幻肢痛,且他们无需使用假肢就能在室内行走。
我们建议,在不可能进行经跖骨截肢且能保留约5厘米足底的情况下,皮罗戈夫截肢术应作为足部部分创伤性截肢和其他损伤治疗的首选方法。