• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科林斯关于1950年英国全科医疗的报告:未被认可的英国社会研究先驱之作?

Collings report on general practice in England in 1950: unrecognised, pioneering piece of British social research?

作者信息

Petchey R

机构信息

Department of General Practice, Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham.

出版信息

BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):40-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.40.

DOI:10.1136/bmj.311.6996.40
PMID:7613328
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2550090/
Abstract

Collings's grim description of postwar general practice in England and his sombre analysis of its prospects created an immediate sensation. In addition to its value as a historical document, the report is also regarded as a turning point in the postwar history of British general practice. The study is also interesting for another reason, which has not been acknowledged: Collings merits recognition as a pioneer of ethnographic research at a time when it was largely unknown elsewhere in British social research.

摘要

科林斯对英国战后全科医疗的严峻描述以及他对其前景的悲观分析立刻引起了轰动。除了作为一份历史文献的价值外,该报告也被视为英国全科医疗战后历史的一个转折点。这项研究还有另一个有趣的原因,而这一点尚未得到认可:在英国社会研究的其他地方,人种志研究在很大程度上还不为人知的时候,科林斯值得被视为该研究领域的先驱。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e247/2550090/8c5366e0fcaa/bmj00599-0045-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e247/2550090/8c5366e0fcaa/bmj00599-0045-a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e247/2550090/8c5366e0fcaa/bmj00599-0045-a.jpg

相似文献

1
Collings report on general practice in England in 1950: unrecognised, pioneering piece of British social research?科林斯关于1950年英国全科医疗的报告:未被认可的英国社会研究先驱之作?
BMJ. 1995 Jul 1;311(6996):40-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.6996.40.
2
Doctor J.S. Collings.J.S. 科林斯医生。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1971 May;21(106):251-2.
3
General practitioners and hospitals.全科医生和医院。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1968 Mar;15(3):165-74.
4
[Liberty, equality, fraternity].[自由、平等、博爱]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Feb;74(2):59-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1304586. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
5
Clinicians' autonomy till the bitter end--can we learn from the extraordinary case of Harold Shipman?临床医生的自主权直至最后关头——我们能从哈罗德·希普曼的离奇案例中学到什么?
Neth J Med. 2004 Jul-Aug;62(7):261-3.
6
[125 years "Progress in Medicine"].[医学125年的进步]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2008 Nov 27;150(48):44, 46.
7
[Fusion, family practitioner information, new image text].[融合、家庭医生信息、新图像文本]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2008 Nov 27;150(48):40-1.
8
General practice into the next century.进入下个世纪的全科医疗。
Practitioner. 2000 Jan;244(1606):7.
9
Welfare with or without the state: British pluralists, American progressives, and the conditions of social justice.有国家干预或无国家干预下的福利:英国多元主义者、美国进步主义者与社会正义的条件
Eur Leg Towar New Paradig. 2001;6(2):201-13. doi: 10.1080/10848770120031387.
10
A century of general practice.一个世纪的全科医疗
BMJ. 2006 Jan 7;332(7532):39-40. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7532.39.

引用本文的文献

1
An Australian reflects on the Collings report 70 years on.一名澳大利亚人在70年后对科林斯报告进行反思。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 25;70(696):356-357. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710681. Print 2020 Jul.
2
Practice visits as a tool in quality improvement: mutual visits and feedback by peers compared with visits and feedback by non-physician observers.将实践访问作为质量改进的工具:同行间的相互访问与反馈和非医生观察员的访问与反馈之比较
Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):161-6. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.161.
3
Qualitative thesis explored social dislocation and health.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of intrathecal tuberculin and streptomycin in tuberculous meningitis; an interim report.鞘内注射结核菌素和链霉素治疗结核性脑膜炎的效果;中期报告。
Lancet. 1950 Aug 19;2(6625):275-86. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(50)91232-3.
2
The scope and development of general practice in relation to other branches of medicine; a constructive review.全科医学相对于医学其他分支的范围与发展;一项建设性综述。
Lancet. 1955 Oct 1;269(6892):681-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(55)92255-8.
3
The concept of the family doctor.家庭医生的概念。
定性研究论文探讨了社会脱节与健康问题。
BMJ. 1995 Oct 21;311(7012):1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1092a.
Bull Hist Med. 1984 Fall;58(3):347-62.
4
The foundation of a college. The conception, birth, and early days of the College of General Practitioners.一所学院的创立。全科医生学院的构想、诞生及早期岁月。
J R Coll Gen Pract. 1973 Jan;23(126):5-20.
5
Qualitative research and family practice: a marriage made in heaven?定性研究与家庭医疗:天作之合?
Fam Pract. 1992 Mar;9(1):85-91. doi: 10.1093/fampra/9.1.85.