Kruis W, Judmaier G, Kayasseh L, Stolte M, Theuer D, Scheurlen C, Hentschel E, Kratochvil P
Evangelisches Krankenhaus Köln-Kalk, Germany.
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1995 May;7(5):391-6.
To determine the therapeutic efficacy and safety of three doses of olsalazine compared with the standard dose of sulphasalazine.
Randomized double-blind multicentre 6-month study comparing three doses of olsalazine (0.5, 1.25 and 2.0 g daily) and sulphasalazine 2.0 g daily for maintaining remission in patients with ulcerative colitis.
Public hospitals and private practices in Germany, Austria and Switzerland.
A total of 162 patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.
According to intention-to-treat analysis, the failure rates of the different treatment groups were not significantly different (36, 49 and 24% for 0.5, 1.25 and 2.0 g olsalazine daily and 32% for 2.0 g sulphasalazine daily). Olsalazine and sulphasalazine showed a tendency towards lower failure rates in extended (28%) than in distal disease (44%). The withdrawal rate due to adverse effects was 4%, the most frequent single event being diarrhoea (2.5, 5.2 and 11.7% for 0.5, 1.25 and 2.0 g olsalazine daily and 0% for sulphasalazine daily).
This study found no significant differences between the therapeutic efficacy or safety of 0.5-2.0 g olsalazine daily. Because of its sulpha-free formulation olsalazine may, however, be preferred to sulphasalazine.
确定三种剂量的奥沙拉嗪与标准剂量柳氮磺胺吡啶相比的治疗效果和安全性。
一项随机双盲多中心6个月研究,比较三种剂量的奥沙拉嗪(每日0.5、1.25和2.0克)和每日2.0克柳氮磺胺吡啶用于维持溃疡性结肠炎患者缓解的情况。
德国、奥地利和瑞士的公立医院及私人诊所。
共162例处于缓解期的溃疡性结肠炎患者。
根据意向性分析,不同治疗组的失败率无显著差异(每日0.5、1.25和2.0克奥沙拉嗪组分别为36%、49%和24%,每日2.0克柳氮磺胺吡啶组为32%)。奥沙拉嗪和柳氮磺胺吡啶在广泛性疾病(28%)中的失败率有低于远端疾病(44%)的趋势。因不良反应导致的停药率为4%,最常见的单一事件是腹泻(每日0.5、1.25和2.0克奥沙拉嗪组分别为2.5%、5.2%和11.7%,每日柳氮磺胺吡啶组为0%)。
本研究发现每日0.5 - 2.0克奥沙拉嗪的治疗效果或安全性之间无显著差异。然而,由于奥沙拉嗪不含磺胺成分,可能比柳氮磺胺吡啶更受青睐。