Schiffrin E L
MRC Multidisciplinary Research Group on Hypertension, Clinical Research Institute of Montreal, University of Montreal, Canada.
Cardiology. 1995;86 Suppl 1:16-22. doi: 10.1159/000176941.
Studies on the effect of antihypertensive agents on resistance arteries in hypertensive patients have in the past yielded inconclusive results regarding the ability of these drugs to induce a regression toward normal of either the structure or the function of these critically important vessels. We have recently compared the effects of the angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril and of the beta blocker atenolol on the structure and the function of subcutaneous resistance arteries of essential hypertensive patients. The patients were randomly assigned to receive either cilazapril or atenolol for a period of 2 years. The blood pressure was normalized for the duration of the trial by both drugs. The media-to-lumen ratio of resistance arteries, which was significantly increased in all hypertensive patients before starting treatment, was normalized by the 2-year treatment with cilazapril, whereas treatment with atenolol did not result in any change in this vascular parameter. Treatment with cilazapril also returned to normal the contractile responses to several vasoconstrictors, particularly endothelin 1. Endothelium-dependent relaxation responses of blood vessels to acetylcholine were abnormal in hypertensive patients and improved in the cilazapril-treated patients, but remained unchanged in the atenolol-treated ones. We conclude that treatment with the angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitor cilazapril corrects in part the vascular remodeling and the functional abnormalities of resistance arteries of hypertensive patients, whereas treatment with the beta blocker atenolol does not. These results may indicate that treatment with cilazapril and perhaps with other angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitors as well may improve the clinical outcome in hypertension by inducing a regression of abnormal resistance vessel structure and function.
过去,关于抗高血压药物对高血压患者阻力动脉的影响的研究,在这些药物能否使这些至关重要的血管的结构或功能恢复正常这一问题上,得出的结果并不确定。我们最近比较了血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂西拉普利和β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔对原发性高血压患者皮下阻力动脉结构和功能的影响。患者被随机分配接受西拉普利或阿替洛尔治疗,为期2年。在试验期间,两种药物都使血压恢复正常。在开始治疗前,所有高血压患者的阻力动脉中膜与腔径比值均显著增加,经西拉普利治疗2年后该比值恢复正常,而阿替洛尔治疗并未使这一血管参数发生任何变化。西拉普利治疗还使对几种血管收缩剂,特别是内皮素1的收缩反应恢复正常。高血压患者血管对乙酰胆碱的内皮依赖性舒张反应异常,在接受西拉普利治疗的患者中有所改善,但在接受阿替洛尔治疗的患者中保持不变。我们得出结论,血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂西拉普利治疗可部分纠正高血压患者阻力动脉的血管重塑和功能异常,而β受体阻滞剂阿替洛尔治疗则不能。这些结果可能表明,西拉普利以及或许其他血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗可能通过促使异常阻力血管结构和功能的消退来改善高血压的临床结局。