• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The efficacy and safety of once-daily nifedipine administered without food: the coat-core formulation compared with the gastrointestinal therapeutic system formulation in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Nifedipine Study Group.

作者信息

Glasser S P, Ripa S R, Allenby K S, Schwartz L A, Commins B M, Jungerwirth S

机构信息

University of South Florida, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Tampa, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;17(2):296-312. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80028-x.

DOI:10.1016/0149-2918(95)80028-x
PMID:7614530
Abstract

A parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, forced-titration, multicenter study was done to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily nifedipine coat-core (NIF CC) and once-daily nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (NIF GITS) dosed in the fasting state in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Both formulations have been shown to effectively and safely lower blood pressure in placebo-controlled trials. After a 4-week placebo run-in period, 228 patients were randomized to 4 weeks of treatment with either NIF CC 30 mg daily or NIF GITS 30 mg daily. This period was followed by a forced-titration period to nifedipine 60 mg daily for an additional 4 weeks of double-blind therapy. After the 30-mg treatment period (the primary time point), there were no statistically significant differences between treatment groups in mean change from baseline in trough supine diastolic blood pressure, the primary efficacy variable (NIF CC patients, -7.0 mm Hg; NIF GITS patients, -8.4 mm Hg; P = 0.139). Also, because the upper bound of the treatment difference confidence interval was < 3.0 mm Hg, equivalence--as defined in the protocol--was established. After the 60-mg treatment period, the change from baseline in trough supine diastolic blood pressure was significantly greater for patients treated with NIF GITS than for patients treated with NIF CC (NIF GITS patients, -12.0 mm Hg; NIF CC patients, -8.4 mm Hg; P < 0.001). Because the upper bound of the confidence interval was > 3 mm Hg, equivalence cannot be claimed. No statistically significant differences were noted for the comparison of mean 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring changes. Both formulations were well tolerated.

摘要

相似文献

1
The efficacy and safety of once-daily nifedipine administered without food: the coat-core formulation compared with the gastrointestinal therapeutic system formulation in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. Nifedipine Study Group.
Clin Ther. 1995 Mar-Apr;17(2):296-312. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80028-x.
2
The efficacy and safety of once-daily nifedipine: the coat-core formulation compared with the gastrointestinal therapeutic system formulation in patients with mild-to-moderate diastolic hypertension. Nifedipine Study Group.
Clin Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;17(1):12-29. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80003-4.
3
Comparison of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure data in hypertensive patients switched from nifedipine-GITS to nifedipine-CC.从硝苯地平控释片转换为硝苯地平普通片的高血压患者24小时动态血压数据比较。
Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Jan;19(1):94-100. doi: 10.1592/phco.19.1.94.30512.
4
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of nifedipine coat-core versus amlodipine in the treatment of patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension. Hypertension Study Group.硝苯地平控释片与氨氯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效和安全性比较。高血压研究组。
Clin Ther. 1995 Jul-Aug;17(4):686-700. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80045-x.
5
Blood pressure control in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension switched from nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) 30 mg to nifedipine GITS 20 mg.轻度至中度原发性高血压患者的血压控制从硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)30毫克转换为硝苯地平GITS 20毫克。
Clin Ther. 2001 Jan;23(1):87-96. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(01)80032-1.
6
Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system versus nifedipine coat-core: comparison of efficacy via 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统与硝苯地平包芯片:通过24小时动态血压监测比较疗效
Ann Pharmacother. 1997 Jul-Aug;31(7-8):819-22. doi: 10.1177/106002809703100701.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release felodipine and extended-release nifedipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):634-46.
8
A randomised double-blind study comparing nifedipine GITS 20 mg and bendrofluazide 2.5 mg administered once daily in mild-to-moderate hypertension.一项随机双盲研究,比较硝苯地平控释片20毫克和苄氟噻嗪2.5毫克每日一次给药治疗轻至中度高血压的效果。
J Hum Hypertens. 1999 Jan;13(1):69-73. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1000757.
9
Trough and peak effects of a single daily dose of nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) as assessed by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Italian Nifedipine GITS Study Group.通过动态血压监测评估每日单次剂量硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)的谷值和峰值效应。意大利硝苯地平GITS研究组。
J Hypertens Suppl. 1994 Jul;12(5):S23-7.
10
Efficacy, tolerability, and quality of life of losartan, alone or with hydrochlorothiazide, versus nifedipine GITS in patients with essential hypertension.氯沙坦单独或与氢氯噻嗪联用与硝苯地平控释片治疗原发性高血压患者的疗效、耐受性及生活质量比较
Clin Ther. 1996 May-Jun;18(3):411-28. doi: 10.1016/s0149-2918(96)80022-1.

引用本文的文献

1
The nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). Evaluation of pharmaceutical, pharmacokinetic and pharmacological properties.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)。药物、药代动力学和药理学特性评估。
Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996 Jan;30(1):28-51. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199630010-00003.
2
Nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS). A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic efficacy in hypertension and angina pectoris.硝苯地平胃肠道治疗系统(GITS)。对其药效学、药代动力学特性以及在高血压和心绞痛治疗中的疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1995 Sep;50(3):495-512. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199550030-00007.