• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

翻修柄的长度应为多少?

Which length for the revision stem?

作者信息

Toni A, Sudanese A, Bueno Lozano A L, Terzi S, Tabarroni M, Busanelli L, Innao V, Giunti A

机构信息

Clinica Ortopedica dell'Università, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna.

出版信息

Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec;79(4):319-31.

PMID:7614871
Abstract

The results of 79 stem implantations performed between 1981 and 1992 are presented. Mean clinical and radiographic follow-up was obtained 36 months after surgery. All of the prostheses were substituted due to aseptic loosening: of these 68% were cemented. Femoral osteolytic lesions secondary to loosening was classified based on the Paprosky protocol. A severe femoral osteolytic defect (type 2b, 2c or 3 according to Paprosky) was associated with 4% of the cases of loosened cementless prostheses, and with 37% of the cemented ones. Homoplastic bone grafts were used in 40% of the patients. The length of the stems used for reimplantation was short (12-13 cm) in 43%, standard (17-18 cm) in 49%, and long (> or = 22 cm) in 7% of the cases. These stems were cemented in 32% of the cases. The incidence of cementation was different in relation to length, as 62.5% of the short stems were cemented, as compared to 5.3% of the stems of standard length. Clinical results were excellent in 90% of the cases submitted to surgery with short stems, in 80% of those treated with standard stems, and in 50% of the cases of revision surgery where long stems were used. Radiographically, 97% of the short stems were osteointegrated, as compared to 94% of the standard stems and to 25% of the long ones, which were only used in a very few cases to be considered quite complex ones.

摘要

本文呈现了1981年至1992年间79例茎干植入手术的结果。术后平均36个月进行了临床和影像学随访。所有假体均因无菌性松动而被替换:其中68%为骨水泥固定型。根据Paprosky方案对因松动导致的股骨溶骨性病变进行分类。严重的股骨溶骨性缺损(Paprosky分类中的2b型、2c型或3型)在4%的非骨水泥固定型假体松动病例中出现,而在骨水泥固定型假体松动病例中的出现率为37%。40%的患者使用了同种异体骨移植。再植入所用茎干长度较短(12 - 13厘米)的病例占43%,标准长度(17 - 18厘米)的占49%,长度较长(≥22厘米)的占7%。这些茎干中有32%进行了骨水泥固定。骨水泥固定的发生率与长度有关,短茎干中62.5%进行了骨水泥固定,而标准长度茎干的这一比例为5.3%。接受短茎干手术的病例中90%临床效果优异,接受标准茎干治疗的病例中80%效果良好,使用长茎干进行翻修手术的病例中50%效果良好。影像学检查显示,97%的短茎干实现了骨整合,标准茎干为94%,长茎干仅在极少数非常复杂的病例中使用,骨整合率为25%。

相似文献

1
Which length for the revision stem?翻修柄的长度应为多少?
Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec;79(4):319-31.
2
Indications and limits of acetabular reimplantations using screwed prostheses.使用带螺钉假体进行髋臼再植入的适应症和局限性。
Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec;79(4):387-96.
3
[Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].[使用碎骨同种异体骨的骨水泥型与非骨水泥型翻修股骨柄——一项为期5年随访的前瞻性随机研究]
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2003 Nov-Dec;141(6):678-83. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-812405.
4
Revision total hip arthroplasty using cemented collarless double-taper femoral components at a mean follow-up of 13 years (8 to 20): an update.使用无领双锥面骨水泥型股骨假体进行翻修全髋关节置换术,平均随访13年(8至20年):最新报告
Bone Joint J. 2015 Aug;97-B(8):1038-45. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B8.34632.
5
Femoral reconstruction with massive allograft and cementless prosthesis.
Chir Organi Mov. 1994 Oct-Dec;79(4):313-8.
6
Primary aseptic revision of the femoral component of a cemented total hip arthroplasty using a cemented technique without bone graft.初次使用骨水泥技术行全髋关节置换术股骨侧翻修,不使用植骨。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2009 Jun;95(4):243-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2009.04.007. Epub 2009 Jun 11.
7
[Good long term results with a cemented straight femoral shaft prosthesis made of titanium].[采用钛制骨水泥型直柄股骨干假体取得良好长期效果]
Unfallchirurg. 2002 Sep;105(9):804-10. doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0425-4.
8
[Personal experience with the Wagner revision stem in hip joint reoperations].[髋关节再次手术中使用瓦格纳翻修柄的个人经验]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2001;68(3):148-61.
9
The use of extra-long stems in total hip reimplantation.
Chir Organi Mov. 2002 Jul-Sep;87(3):141-51.
10
[Early aseptic loosening of the CF 30 femoral stem].[CF 30股骨柄早期无菌性松动]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):59-64.

引用本文的文献

1
Does size matter? Outcomes following revision total hip arthroplasty with long or primary stems: a systematic review and meta-analysis.尺寸重要吗?使用长柄或初次柄进行翻修全髋关节置换术后的结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arthroplasty. 2024 Jan 9;6(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s42836-023-00228-w.