• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对采用ITI种植体的部分牙列缺损患者的咬合力和口腔触觉敏感性进行测量。

Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.

作者信息

Mericske-Stern R, Assal P, Mericske E, Bürgin W

机构信息

Department of Removable Prosthodontics, University of Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 May-Jun;10(3):345-53.

PMID:7615331
Abstract

Maximal occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility were recorded in (1) a group of partially edentulous patients restored with ITI implants supporting fixed prostheses or single crowns and (2) a control group consisting of fully dentate subjects with healthy natural teeth. Maximal occlusal force was measured with a miniature force transducer placed between antagonistic implant/tooth pairs in the test group and antagonistic teeth in the control group. The detection threshold of minimal pressure (ie, passive tactile sensibility) was recorded with dynamometers, and minimal perceived thickness (active tactile sensibility) was assessed using steel foils with a thickness from 100 to 10 microns. Highest maximal occlusal force was measured in fully dentate subjects on second premolars (average 450 N). A significant reduction on the first premolars (300 N) was observed. With fixed prostheses supported by implants, the average value of maximal occlusal force was distinctly lower, about 200 N for first premolars and for molars, and 300 N for second molars. The maximum force was again found on second premolars. The detection threshold of minimal pressure was significantly higher on implants than on natural teeth. The average number of wrong assessments when testing steel foils was 3.2 for antagonistic implant/tooth pairs and 2.6 for natural teeth. The comparison of test sides (with implants) and control sides (without implants) in patients of the test group did not reveal significant differences of measurements. It seems that patterns of oral function depend primarily on the state of dentition, type of prosthodontic restorations, and on psychological aspects, and secondarily on the presence of implants.

摘要

记录了以下两组人群的最大咬合力和口腔触觉敏感度

(1)一组部分牙列缺损患者,使用支持固定义齿或单冠的ITI种植体进行修复;(2)一个由天然牙健康的全口牙列受试者组成的对照组。在试验组中,通过放置在对抗性种植体/牙齿对之间的微型力传感器测量最大咬合力,在对照组中通过对抗性牙齿测量。使用测力计记录最小压力的检测阈值(即被动触觉敏感度),并使用厚度从100至10微米的钢箔评估最小可感知厚度(主动触觉敏感度)。在全口牙列受试者的第二前磨牙上测得最高的最大咬合力(平均450 N)。观察到第一前磨牙的咬合力显著降低(300 N)。对于由种植体支持的固定义齿,第一前磨牙和磨牙的最大咬合力平均值明显较低,约为200 N,第二磨牙为300 N。最大咬合力再次出现在第二前磨牙上。种植体上最小压力的检测阈值显著高于天然牙。测试钢箔时,对抗性种植体/牙齿对的错误评估平均次数为3.2次,天然牙为2.6次。试验组患者的测试侧(有种植体)和对照侧(无种植体)的测量比较未显示出显著差异。口腔功能模式似乎主要取决于牙列状态、修复体类型以及心理因素,其次取决于种植体的存在。

相似文献

1
Occlusal force and oral tactile sensibility measured in partially edentulous patients with ITI implants.对采用ITI种植体的部分牙列缺损患者的咬合力和口腔触觉敏感性进行测量。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995 May-Jun;10(3):345-53.
2
In vivo measurements of maximal occlusal force and minimal pressure threshold on overdentures supported by implants or natural roots: a comparative study, Part 1.种植体或天然牙根支持的覆盖义齿最大咬合力和最小压力阈值的体内测量:一项对比研究,第1部分。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1993;8(6):641-9.
3
Oral tactile sensibility recorded in overdenture wearers with implants or natural roots: a comparative study. Part 2.种植体或天然牙根覆盖义齿佩戴者的口腔触觉敏感性:一项对比研究。第2部分。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994 Jan-Feb;9(1):63-70.
4
In vivo measurements of some functional aspects with mandibular fixed prostheses supported by implants.对种植体支持的下颌固定修复体某些功能方面的体内测量。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996 Jun;7(2):153-61. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070209.x.
5
Maximum clenching force of patients with moderate loss of posterior tooth support: a pilot study.后牙支持组织中度丧失患者的最大咬合力:一项初步研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Nov;88(5):498-502. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.129062.
6
Control of jaw closing forces: a comparison between natural tooth and osseointegrated implant.颌骨闭合力量的控制:天然牙与骨结合种植体的比较
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000 Sep;8(3):113-6.
7
Long-term survival and success of oral implants in the treatment of full and partial arches: a 7-year prospective study with the ITI dental implant system.口腔种植体治疗全牙弓和部分牙弓的长期存活及成功率:使用ITI牙种植系统的7年前瞻性研究
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2004 Mar-Apr;19(2):247-59.
8
Mechanosensation and maximum bite force in edentulous patients rehabilitated with bimaxillary implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.无牙颌患者采用双颌种植体支持的固定义齿修复后的机械感觉和最大咬合力。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 May;23(5):577-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02283.x. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
9
Tactile sensibility of single-tooth implants and natural teeth.单颗牙种植体与天然牙的触觉敏感性。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007 Apr;18(2):231-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01321.x.
10
Restoration of partially edentulous patients using dental implants with a microtextured surface: a prospective comparison of delayed and immediate full occlusal loading.使用具有微纹理表面的牙种植体修复部分牙列缺失患者:延迟和即刻全牙合加载的前瞻性比较。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003 Jul-Aug;18(4):512-22.

引用本文的文献

1
An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial.一种基于口腔内扫描和传统印模技术的咬合接触区域临床比较分析的创新性评估方法:一项临床试验。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 24;28(10):543. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05940-8.
2
Effects of diameters of implant and abutment screw on stress distribution within dental implant and alveolar bone: A three-dimensional finite element analysis.种植体和基台螺丝直径对牙种植体及牙槽骨内应力分布的影响:三维有限元分析
J Dent Sci. 2024 Apr;19(2):1126-1134. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2023.12.020. Epub 2024 Jan 11.
3
Restoratively driven planning for implants in the posterior maxilla - Part 1: alveolar bone healing, bone assessment and clinical classifications.
基于修复为导向的上颌后牙区种植规划——第 1 部分:牙槽嵴骨愈合、骨评估及临床分类。
Br Dent J. 2023 Oct;235(8):585-592. doi: 10.1038/s41415-023-6391-7. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
4
Active Tactile Sensibility in Implant Prosthesis vs. Complete Dentures: A Psychophysical Study.种植义齿与全口义齿的主动触觉敏感性:一项心理物理学研究。
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 18;11(22):6819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11226819.
5
Biomechanical finite element analysis of short-implant-supported, 3-unit, fixed CAD/CAM prostheses in the posterior mandible.下颌后牙区短种植体支持的三单位 CAD/CAM 固定修复体的生物力学有限元分析
Int J Implant Dent. 2022 Feb 11;8(1):8. doi: 10.1186/s40729-022-00404-8.
6
Influence of Framework Material and Posterior Implant Angulation in Full-Arch All-on-4 Implant-Supported Prosthesis Stress Concentration.全牙弓All-on-4种植支持式义齿中框架材料和种植体后置角度对应力集中的影响
Dent J (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;10(1):12. doi: 10.3390/dj10010012.
7
Effect of Opposite Tooth Condition on Marginal Bone Loss around Submerged Dental Implants: A Retrospective Study with a 3-Year Follow-Up.对颌牙条件对种植体周边缘骨丧失的影响:一项为期 3 年的回顾性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 13;18(20):10715. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010715.
8
Stress distribution of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses reinforced with silica-nylon mesh.用二氧化硅-尼龙网增强的全牙弓种植体支持修复体的应力分布
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Dec 1;11(12):e1163-e1169. doi: 10.4317/jced.56470. eCollection 2019 Dec.
9
Active tactile sensibility of three-unit implant-supported FPDs versus natural dentition.三单位种植体支持的固定局部义齿与天然牙列的主动触觉敏感性
J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Jul 1;11(7):e636-e641. doi: 10.4317/jced.55748. eCollection 2019 Jul.
10
Biomechanical Effect of an Exposed Dental Implant's First Thread: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis Study.暴露式种植体第一螺纹的生物力学效应:一项三维有限元分析研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 May 27;25:3933-3940. doi: 10.12659/MSM.913186.