Suppr超能文献

颞叶肿瘤伴复杂部分性发作的病灶切除术与电生理引导下切除术的对比研究

Lesionectomy versus electrophysiologically guided resection for temporal lobe tumors manifesting with complex partial seizures.

作者信息

Jooma R, Yeh H S, Privitera M D, Gartner M

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):231-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0231.

Abstract

Complex partial seizures associated with tumors and other mass lesions are readily diagnosed by modern imaging techniques but their optimum surgical treatment remains unresolved. Lesionectomy has been reported to produce seizure outcomes equal to outcomes after resection that ablates the epileptogenic cortex with the lesion. However, some evidence suggests that when the lesion is in the temporal lobe, simple excision of the tumor or lesion more often fails to control seizures. After retrospectively reviewing the records of 30 patients with complex partial seizures and temporal lobe tumors who underwent surgical treatment at the University of Cincinnati hospitals (1985-1992), the authors divided them into two groups: Group A (16 patients) underwent lesionectomy only and Group B (14 patients) received surgical treatment for seizures with electroencephalographic delineation of the epileptogenic zone and resection of the lesion. Seizure control was best achieved in Group B patients with 13 (92.8%) seizure free at follow up (mean 52 months). Only three (18.8%) of the Group A patients became seizure free after lesionectomy at follow up (mean 33 months). In eight Group A patients, who underwent temporal lobectomy as a second procedure after lesionectomy failed to control seizures, five (62.5%) became seizure free. Group B patients had a longer duration of seizures and were more likely to have lesions smaller than 2.5 cm compared with Group A. Analysis of covariance demonstrated that the differences in outcome between the groups remained significant even with adjustment for the variation in duration of seizures (p = 0.0006) and size of tumor (p = 0.0001). Based on this study, the authors found that the probable relief from seizures caused by a temporal lobe lesion is greater if the region of epileptogenicity, usually the amygdalohippocampal complex, is resected along with the tumor in a temporal lobectomy.

摘要

与肿瘤及其他占位性病变相关的复杂部分性癫痫发作,通过现代影像学技术很容易诊断出来,但它们的最佳手术治疗方案仍未解决。据报道,病损切除术产生的癫痫发作控制效果与切除病损并同时切除致痫皮层后的效果相当。然而,一些证据表明,当病损位于颞叶时,单纯切除肿瘤或病损往往无法控制癫痫发作。在回顾性分析了1985年至1992年在辛辛那提大学医院接受手术治疗的30例患有复杂部分性癫痫发作和颞叶肿瘤的患者记录后,作者将他们分为两组:A组(16例患者)仅接受病损切除术,B组(14例患者)接受了通过脑电图描绘致痫区并切除病损的癫痫手术治疗。B组患者的癫痫发作控制效果最佳,随访时13例(92.8%)无癫痫发作(平均随访52个月)。A组患者在病损切除术后随访时(平均33个月)只有3例(18.8%)无癫痫发作。在8例病损切除术后未能控制癫痫发作而接受颞叶切除术作为第二步手术的A组患者中,5例(62.5%)无癫痫发作。与A组相比,B组患者的癫痫发作持续时间更长,且病损小于2.5 cm的可能性更大。协方差分析表明,即使对癫痫发作持续时间的差异(p = 0.0006)和肿瘤大小的差异(p = 0.0001)进行调整,两组之间的结果差异仍然显著。基于这项研究,作者发现,如果在颞叶切除术中连同肿瘤一起切除通常为杏仁核海马复合体的致痫区,由颞叶病损引起的癫痫发作可能得到更大程度的缓解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验