Knick V C, Eberwein D J, Miller C G
Division of Cell Biology, Burroughs Wellcome Co., Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1995 Jul 19;87(14):1072-7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/87.14.1072.
Many critical cellular functions such as mitosis, cell movement, and maintenance of cell structure are performed by microtubules. Antimicrotubule agents (which disrupt or block the formation of microtubules) are among the most widely used anticancer drugs and have contributed to the curative therapy of many neoplasms. Recently, two new antimicrotubule agents, vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine) and paclitaxel (Taxol) have demonstrated clinical activity against ovarian, breast, and non-small-cell lung carcinomas. These agents target microtubules at different sites, and they both interfere with mitotic spindle function. Since vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel have shown a similar antitumor profile in clinical trials thus far, it is reasonable to expect that they may be used interchangeably in some combination therapies or perhaps with each other in the same treatment regimen.
On the basis of their similar activity profile in clinical trials, we decided to investigate the therapeutic outcome of a vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel binary drug combination, even though they appeared to have overlapping toxic effects. We wanted to ascertain the effect of this binary drug combination, in an in vivo setting, as it related to host toxicity and antitumor activity.
CDF-1 female mice that were implanted intraperitoneally with one million P388 murine leukemia cells were treated intraperitoneally with vinorelbine tartrate, paclitaxel, or a combination of the two drugs on a day-1, -5, and -9 dosing schedule. Experimental groups had between five and eight mice per group. Vinorelbine tartrate was administered at either 8, 12, 16, 20, or 24 mg/kg and paclitaxel at either 4.5, 18, or 36 mg/kg.
As single agents, neither vinorelbine tartrate nor paclitaxel generated meaningful numbers of 60-day cures (i.e., tumor free at day 60). In contrast, optimal combination regimens produced 60-day cures in more than 80% of the mice. The LD10 (dose lethal to 10% of the mice) of vinorelbine tartrate increased approximately 2.5-fold in the presence of paclitaxel and allowed otherwise lethal vinorelbine tartrate doses to be administered safely, which may have contributed to the antitumor efficacy of the combinations. The effect of the time delay between vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel administration on toxicity and cures appeared to be contingent on the vinorelbine tartrate dose.
Results suggest that the overlapping toxic effects of vinorelbine tartrate and paclitaxel might not be a deterrent to their use in combination drug therapy. When used appropriately, rather than having enhanced toxic effects, otherwise toxic doses were better tolerated and survival improved over single-agent therapy.
许多关键的细胞功能,如细胞有丝分裂、细胞运动和细胞结构维持,均由微管执行。抗微管药物(破坏或阻断微管形成的药物)是应用最为广泛的抗癌药物之一,对多种肿瘤的治愈性治疗做出了贡献。最近,两种新型抗微管药物,酒石酸长春瑞滨(诺维本)和紫杉醇(泰素)已显示出对卵巢癌、乳腺癌和非小细胞肺癌的临床活性。这些药物在不同位点作用于微管,且均干扰有丝分裂纺锤体功能。鉴于酒石酸长春瑞滨和紫杉醇在目前的临床试验中显示出相似的抗肿瘤谱,合理预期它们可能在某些联合治疗中可互换使用,或者在同一治疗方案中相互联合使用。
基于它们在临床试验中相似的活性谱,我们决定研究酒石酸长春瑞滨和紫杉醇二元药物组合的治疗效果,尽管它们似乎具有重叠的毒性作用。我们想确定这种二元药物组合在体内环境中与宿主毒性和抗肿瘤活性相关的作用。
腹腔内植入100万个P388小鼠白血病细胞的CDF-1雌性小鼠,于第1、5和9天按给药方案腹腔内给予酒石酸长春瑞滨、紫杉醇或两种药物的组合。实验组每组有5至8只小鼠。酒石酸长春瑞滨的给药剂量为8、12、16、20或24mg/kg,紫杉醇的给药剂量为4.5、18或36mg/kg。
作为单一药物,酒石酸长春瑞滨和紫杉醇均未产生可观数量的60天治愈小鼠(即第60天时无肿瘤)。相比之下,最佳联合方案使超过80%的小鼠实现了60天治愈。在紫杉醇存在的情况下,酒石酸长春瑞滨的LD10(对10%的小鼠致死的剂量)增加了约2.5倍,使得原本致死剂量的酒石酸长春瑞滨能够安全给药,这可能有助于联合用药的抗肿瘤疗效。酒石酸长春瑞滨和紫杉醇给药时间间隔对毒性和治愈效果的影响似乎取决于酒石酸长春瑞滨的剂量。
结果表明,酒石酸长春瑞滨和紫杉醇重叠的毒性作用可能并不妨碍它们在联合药物治疗中的使用。当适当使用时,非但没有增强毒性作用,原本有毒的剂量反而耐受性更好,且与单药治疗相比生存期有所改善。