Cohen A, Guyon P, Johnson N, Chauvel C, Logeart D, Costagliola D, Valty J
Department of Cardiology, Saint-Antoine University Hospital, Paris, France.
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Aug 1;76(4):220-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80069-1.
To test the diagnostic value of different hemodynamic indexes for the diagnosis of acute right ventricular (RV) ischemic dysfunction, we studied 2 groups of consecutive patients admitted for an acute left ventricular inferior wall myocardial infarction: 51 patients with (group 1) and 32 patients without (group 2) RV ischemia as determined by coronary angiography. In both groups, we analyzed by right-sided cardiac catheterization right-sided heart pressures, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and cardiac index. We also calculated pressure ratios (mean right atrial pressure or RV end-diastolic over pulmonary capillary wedge pressures), pulmonary vascular resistance, and RV stroke work index. We found significant differences (p < 0.01) between the 2 groups when comparing mean right atrial pressure, RV end-diastolic pressure, ratio of these 2 pressures over pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, RV stroke work index, and right atrial and RV pressure waveforms. The best combined sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy were found for the right atrial M or W waveform pattern, isolated or combined with a disproportionate elevation of RV end-diastolic over pulmonary capillary wedge pressures (respectively, 92%, 94%, 90%, 87%, and 89%). Volume loading was performed in 27 patients (18 with and 9 without RV ischemia). Right heart pressures and RV stroke work index increased significantly and similarly in both groups. Cardiac index increased significantly only in patients without RV ischemia (p = 0.02). However, volume loading did not significantly modify the diagnostic value of the different hemodynamic criteria studied.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
为了测试不同血流动力学指标对急性右心室(RV)缺血性功能障碍诊断的价值,我们研究了两组因急性左心室下壁心肌梗死连续入院的患者:51例经冠状动脉造影确定存在RV缺血的患者(第1组)和32例不存在RV缺血的患者(第2组)。在两组中,我们通过右心导管检查分析了右心压力、肺毛细血管楔压和心脏指数。我们还计算了压力比值(平均右心房压力或RV舒张末期压力与肺毛细血管楔压的比值)、肺血管阻力和RV每搏功指数。比较平均右心房压力、RV舒张末期压力、这两个压力与肺毛细血管楔压的比值、RV每搏功指数以及右心房和RV压力波形时,我们发现两组之间存在显著差异(p < 0.01)。对于右心房M或W波形模式,单独或与RV舒张末期压力相对于肺毛细血管楔压的不成比例升高相结合,发现其综合敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和诊断准确性最佳(分别为92%、94%、90%、87%和89%)。对27例患者(18例存在RV缺血,9例不存在RV缺血)进行了容量负荷试验。两组的右心压力和RV每搏功指数均显著且相似地增加。仅在不存在RV缺血的患者中,心脏指数显著增加(p = 0.02)。然而,容量负荷并未显著改变所研究的不同血流动力学标准的诊断价值。(摘要截断于250字)