Schulze C G, Blum U, Haag K
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital, Freiburg, Germany.
Acta Radiol. 1995 Jul;36(4):377-80.
In a prospective investigation the sensitivity of conventional radiography, sonography, color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and CT in the detection of hepatic portal venous gas (HPVG) was compared in 7 patients with different diagnoses. For the identification of HPVG sonography, CDFI and CT have a higher sensitivity than conventional radiography. CT, however, was the most suitable method to identify the underlying cause of HPVG. Patients with iatrogenic HPVG as a result of diagnostic or therapeutic intervention had a good prognosis. In contrast, in all cases with a sudden appearance of HPVG and a noniatrogenic cause, exitus ensued within 1 week.
在一项前瞻性研究中,对7例不同诊断的患者比较了传统X线摄影、超声、彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)和CT检测肝门静脉气体(HPVG)的敏感性。对于HPVG的识别,超声、CDFI和CT比传统X线摄影具有更高的敏感性。然而,CT是识别HPVG潜在病因最合适的方法。因诊断或治疗干预导致医源性HPVG的患者预后良好。相比之下,在所有HPVG突然出现且病因非医源性的病例中,患者均在1周内死亡。