Stanton B, Black M, Feigelman S, Ricardo I, Galbraith J, Li X, Kaljee L, Keane V, Nesbitt R
Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland, Baltimore 21201, USA.
AIDS Educ Prev. 1995 Apr;7(2):160-77.
The creation of developmentally and culturally appropriate data-gathering instruments is necessary as health researchers and interventionists expand their investigations to community-based minority adolescent populations. The creation of such instruments is a complex process, requiring the integration of multiple data-gathering and analytic approaches. Recent efforts have delineated several issues to be considered in survey design for minority populations: community collaboration; problem conceptualization; application of the presumed model of behavioral change; and dialect and format of delivery. This paper describes the process of creating a culturally and developmentally appropriate, theoretically grounded instrument for use in monitoring the impact of an AIDS educational intervention on the behavior and health outcomes of urban African-American pre-adolescents and early adolescents. Three phases of research were involved: preliminary (and ongoing) ethnographic research including extensive participant observation, as well as, focus group and individual interviews with 65 youths; construction and testing of the preliminary instrument involving two waves of pilot testing (N1 = 57; N2 = 45); and, finalization of the instrument including reliability testing and assessment of tool constructs and selection of the mode of delivery (involving 2 additional waves of pilot testing (N3 = 91; N4 = 351). The essential role played by the community in all phases of instrument development is underscored.
随着健康研究人员和干预专家将研究范围扩大到以社区为基础的少数族裔青少年群体,创建适合其发展阶段和文化背景的数据收集工具变得十分必要。创建此类工具是一个复杂的过程,需要整合多种数据收集和分析方法。最近的研究明确了在针对少数族裔群体的调查设计中需要考虑的几个问题:社区合作;问题概念化;行为改变假设模型的应用;以及语言方言和传播形式。本文描述了创建一个适合文化和发展阶段、基于理论的工具的过程,该工具用于监测艾滋病教育干预对城市非裔美国学龄前儿童和青少年的行为及健康结果的影响。研究包括三个阶段:初步(且持续进行)的人种志研究,包括广泛的参与观察,以及对65名青少年进行焦点小组和个人访谈;初步工具的构建与测试,涉及两轮试点测试(N1 = 57;N2 = 45);以及工具的最终确定,包括可靠性测试、工具结构评估和传播方式选择(涉及另外两轮试点测试(N3 = 91;N4 = 351)。文中强调了社区在工具开发各阶段所发挥的重要作用。