Ohnishi K, Ohno R, Tomonaga M, Kamada N, Onozawa K, Kuramoto A, Dohy H, Mizoguchi H, Miyawaki S, Tsubaki K
Department of Medicine III, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Japan.
Blood. 1995 Aug 1;86(3):906-16.
A multicenter randomized study was conducted to compare the effect of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) with that of busulfan in newly diagnosed patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) in chronic phase. From October 1988 to October 1991, 170 patients were randomized to receive either IFN-alpha or busulfan. Of 159 eligible patients, 31 (38.8%) of 80 patients in the IFN-alpha group and 43 (54.4%) of 79 patients in the busulfan group achieved complete hematologic remission, and 38.8% in the IFN-alpha group and 43.0% in the busulfan group achieved partial hematologic remission. A complete cytogenetic response was induced in seven (8.8%) of 80 patients treated with IFN-alpha and two (2.5%) of 79 patients treated with busulfan, and a partial cytogenetic response was 7.5% (6/80) and 2.5% (2/79), respectively. The difference in major (complete and partial) cytogenetic response between the two groups was significant (P = .046). At a median follow-up of 50 months, the predicted 5-year survival rate was 54% in the IFN-alpha group and 32% in the busulfan group (P = .0290), and the predicted 5-year rate of remaining in chronic phase was 41% in the IFN-alpha group and 29% in the busulfan group (P = .1165). As compared with the patients with no cytogenetic response, the patients with any cytogenetic response (complete, partial or minor) after the IFN-alpha or busulfan treatment were significantly superior in the duration of chronic phase (IFN-alpha group; P = .0017, busulfan group; P = .0010) even after correction for the time to response using the landmark analysis. However, there was no significant difference in survival rate in the IFN-alpha group (P = .1065). There was no significant difference in survival rate (P = .3923) and the duration of chronic phase (P = .6258) between the IFN-alpha and the busulfan group in the patients with a cytogenetic response (complete, partial or minor). These results demonstrate that IFN-alpha treatment produces a significantly superior cytogenetic response and survival rate as compared with the busulfan treatment, and unexpectedly, that busulfan can also eliminate Philadelphia chromosome positive clone in a few patients who showed prolonged survival rate and duration of chronic phase.
进行了一项多中心随机研究,比较干扰素-α(IFN-α)与白消安对新诊断的慢性期慢性粒细胞白血病(CML)患者的疗效。1988年10月至1991年10月,170例患者被随机分配接受IFN-α或白消安治疗。在159例符合条件的患者中,IFN-α组80例患者中有31例(38.8%)、白消安组79例患者中有43例(54.4%)实现了完全血液学缓解,IFN-α组38.8%、白消安组43.0%实现了部分血液学缓解。接受IFN-α治疗的80例患者中有7例(8.8%)、接受白消安治疗的79例患者中有2例(2.5%)诱导出完全细胞遗传学缓解,部分细胞遗传学缓解率分别为7.5%(6/80)和2.5%(2/79)。两组主要(完全和部分)细胞遗传学缓解率的差异有统计学意义(P = 0.046)。中位随访50个月时,IFN-α组预计5年生存率为54%,白消安组为32%(P = 0.0290),IFN-α组预计5年慢性期持续率为41%,白消安组为29%(P = 0.1165)。与无细胞遗传学缓解的患者相比,IFN-α或白消安治疗后有任何细胞遗传学缓解(完全、部分或微小)的患者,即使使用标志性分析校正缓解时间后,慢性期持续时间仍显著更长(IFN-α组;P = 0.0017,白消安组;P = 0.0010)。然而,IFN-α组的生存率无显著差异(P = 0.1065)。有细胞遗传学缓解(完全、部分或微小)的患者中,IFN-α组和白消安组的生存率(P = 0.3923)和慢性期持续时间(P = 0.6258)无显著差异。这些结果表明,与白消安治疗相比,IFN-α治疗产生显著更好的细胞遗传学缓解率和生存率,并且出乎意料的是,白消安也能在少数生存期延长和慢性期持续时间延长的患者中消除费城染色体阳性克隆。