Brady A P, Somers S, Hough D, Stevenson G W
Department of Radiology, McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Abdom Imaging. 1995 May-Jun;20(3):245-7. doi: 10.1007/BF00200406.
Defecography is commonly used in investigation of pelvic floor and anorectal dysfunction, and incorporates measurement of pelvic floor movement during various maneuvers. These measurements are usually referenced to bony landmarks, particularly the ischial tuberosities. These bony landmarks may be difficult to visualize; theoretically, the use of digital subtraction in filming defecography studies should eliminate the need to pinpoint bony position.
We filmed 25 defecogram studies in both non-subtracted and subtracted formats, and interpreted each study blindly, subsequently comparing diagnoses and measurements.
Subtraction was of limited benefit in only one case, was impossible in one case, added no useful information in 18 cases, and hindered visualization of abnormalities in five cases.
Because of the multiple overlapping densities and the inability to restrict patient movement, digital subtraction is unhelpful in defecography.
排粪造影常用于盆底和肛门直肠功能障碍的检查,包括在各种动作过程中测量盆底运动。这些测量通常以骨性标志为参照,尤其是坐骨结节。这些骨性标志可能难以可视化;理论上,在排粪造影研究中使用数字减法应无需精确确定骨骼位置。
我们以未减影和减影两种形式拍摄了25项排粪造影研究,并对每项研究进行盲法解读,随后比较诊断结果和测量数据。
减影仅在1例中益处有限,在1例中无法进行,在18例中未增加有用信息,在5例中妨碍了异常情况的可视化。
由于存在多种重叠密度且无法限制患者移动,数字减法在排粪造影中并无帮助。