Capriles-Hulett A, Sánchez-Borges M, Von-Scanzoni C, Medina J R
Department of Pediatrics, Centro Médico-Docente La Trinidad, Venezuela.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1995 Jul;75(1):62-4.
The prevalence of latex allergy appears to be substantially higher in certain high risk groups, particularly in children with spina bifida. The source of this increase is presently unknown and may be due either to increased infantile exposure or to an intrinsic predilection for atopy in this condition.
We attempted to ascertain the prevalence of latex and tropical fruit allergy in children of lower socioeconomic strata with spina bifida from Caracas, Venezuela, who have limited operative and other medical exposure to latex.
Ninety-three unselected patients with spina bifida from clinic and hospital populations were prick tested with commercial (Stallergenes-Pasteur) latex extract and crude glove (Baxter-Triflex, 1/5 wt/vol) latex extract as well as with standardized mite and cockroach, 1/10 wt/vol, extracts (Hollister-Stier). An array of tropical fruits were also included in the battery of skin test materials, using the prick by prick method. Careful family and personal history for allergy as well as any reactions to rubber products were noted, placing emphasis on intraoperative anaphylaxis, number of operations and use of bladder catheters.
Only four patients of the 93 skin tested (4.3%) were positive to latex. Atopy was not a predisposing factor for latex allergy and neither was the number of surgical interventions. No fruit allergy was found in this population and three of the four skin test-positive patients had facial angioedema when exposed to balloons.
The very low incidence of latex allergy found in our patients with spina bifida could very well be due to a low level of rubber exposure as best exemplified in the use of nonlatex bladder catheters, frequently washed and resterilized surgeon's gloves, and low number of operations per patient. The fact that atopy was no more prevalent in children with spina bifida than in the general population in Venezuela strongly supports exposure level as the major factor determining latex sensitization.
乳胶过敏在某些高危人群中的患病率似乎显著更高,尤其是脊柱裂患儿。这种增加的原因目前尚不清楚,可能是由于婴儿接触乳胶增加,也可能是由于这种情况下内在的特应性倾向。
我们试图确定来自委内瑞拉加拉加斯社会经济地位较低、脊柱裂患儿乳胶和热带水果过敏的患病率,这些患儿接受乳胶手术及其他医疗接触有限。
对来自诊所和医院的93例未经挑选的脊柱裂患者,用市售(Stallergenes - Pasteur)乳胶提取物和粗制手套(Baxter - Triflex,1/5重量/体积)乳胶提取物以及标准化螨和蟑螂提取物(1/10重量/体积,Hollister - Stier)进行点刺试验。一系列热带水果也被纳入皮肤试验材料中,采用逐点刺法。记录详细的家族和个人过敏史以及对橡胶制品的任何反应,重点关注术中过敏反应、手术次数和膀胱导管的使用情况。
93例接受皮肤试验的患者中只有4例(4.3%)对乳胶呈阳性反应。特应性不是乳胶过敏的易感因素,手术干预次数也不是。该人群中未发现水果过敏,4例皮肤试验阳性患者中有3例在接触气球时出现面部血管性水肿。
我们的脊柱裂患者中乳胶过敏发生率极低很可能是由于橡胶接触水平低,这在使用非乳胶膀胱导管、经常清洗和重新消毒的外科医生手套以及每位患者手术次数少中得到了最好的体现。脊柱裂患儿的特应性并不比委内瑞拉普通人群更普遍这一事实有力地支持了接触水平是决定乳胶致敏的主要因素。