Bromm B, Chen A C
Institute of Physiology, University Hospital Eppendorf, University of Hamburg, Germany.
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Jul;95(1):14-26. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(95)00032-t.
Cerebral generators of long latency brain potentials in response to painful heat stimuli were identified from potential distributions in 31 EEG leads, using the brain electrical source analysis (BESA) programme in the multiple spatio-temporal dipole mode. Data were taken from a study with 10 young healthy male subjects who participated in 3 identical sessions, 1 week apart, with 4 blocks of 40 stimuli (randomized intensities above mean pain threshold). Brief infrared laser heat pulses were applied to the right temple; laser evoked brain potentials (LEPs) were averaged over 40 stimuli per block. BESA was applied to the grand mean maps averaged over the 10 subjects, 3 sessions and 4 stimulus blocks per session, as well as to the individual maps. In all cases 4 generators could consistently be identified by BESA, which were able to explain up to 98.8% of the total variance in scalp distributions at certain time intervals: dipole I with a maximum activity at 106.3 msec in the contralateral somatosensory trigeminal cortex, 19.0 mm beneath the surface; dipole II with a maximum activity at 112.1 msec at the corresponding ipsilateral area at a depth of 13.6 mm; dipole III with a maximum activity at 130.4 msec in the frontal cortex; dipole IV with 2 relative maximum activities at 150.6 and 220.5 msec, localized centrally under the vertex at a depth of 33.1 mm, which described both the late vertex negativity and the consecutive positivity. BESA applied to the individual LEP maps of each individual and session yielded again 4 major generators with sites, strengths and orientations comparable to those of the grand mean evaluations. The standard deviation (S.D.) of site coordinates within subjects was less than 3 mm for dipoles I, II and IV (5 mm for dipole III). The between-subject standard deviation was considerably larger (15 mm), which was attributed to individual differences in head geometry, size and anatomy. Dipoles I and II are assumed to be generators in secondary somatosensory areas of the trigeminal nerve system with bilateral representation, though significantly stronger in the contralateral site. Dipole III in the frontal cortex may be related to attention and arousal processes, as well as to motor cortical initiation for eye movements and muscle effects. The central dipole IV describing all late activity between 150 and 220 msec is probably a representative of perceptual activation and cognitive information processing; it was located in deep midline brain structure, e.g., the cingular gyrus.
采用多时空偶极子模式下的脑电源分析(BESA)程序,根据31个脑电图导联中的电位分布,确定了对热痛刺激产生的长潜伏期脑电位的脑发生器。数据来自一项针对10名年轻健康男性受试者的研究,他们参加了3次相同的实验,每次间隔1周,每次实验有4个包含40次刺激的组块(随机强度高于平均疼痛阈值)。短暂的红外激光热脉冲施加于右侧颞部;每个组块的40次刺激的激光诱发脑电位(LEP)进行平均。BESA应用于10名受试者、3次实验以及每次实验的4个刺激组块的平均总均值图,以及个体图。在所有情况下,BESA能够一致地识别出4个发生器,在特定时间间隔内,它们能够解释头皮分布中高达98.8%的总方差:偶极子I在对侧躯体感觉三叉神经皮质表面以下19.0毫米处,在106.3毫秒时活动达到最大值;偶极子II在相应的同侧区域,深度为13.6毫米,在112.1毫秒时活动达到最大值;偶极子III在额叶皮质,在130.4毫秒时活动达到最大值;偶极子IV在150.6毫秒和220.5毫秒有2个相对的活动最大值,位于头顶中央下方,深度为33.1毫米,它描述了晚期顶点负波和随后的正波。BESA应用于每个个体和每次实验的个体LEP图,再次得到4个主要发生器,其位置、强度和方向与总均值评估的结果相当。偶极子I、II和IV在受试者内部的位置坐标标准差小于3毫米(偶极子III为5毫米)。受试者之间的标准差要大得多(15毫米),这归因于头部几何形状、大小和解剖结构的个体差异。偶极子I和II被认为是三叉神经系统二级体感区域的发生器,具有双侧代表,但对侧部位明显更强。额叶皮质中的偶极子III可能与注意力和唤醒过程有关,也与眼球运动和肌肉效应的运动皮质启动有关。描述150至220毫秒之间所有晚期活动的中央偶极子IV可能是感知激活和认知信息处理的代表;它位于脑深部中线结构,如扣带回。