Campbell L S, Dougan J D
Illinois Wesleyan University, Bloomington 61702, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1995 Jul;64(1):95-110. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1995.64-95.
Previous studies examining the relationship between response rate and reinforcement rate on variable-interval schedules (the variable-interval response function) have confounded elapsed session time with within-session changes in food density. The present experiments attempted to manipulate these factors independently and thus isolate their effects on responding. In Experiment 1, 7 rats pressed a bar for food on a series of four variable-interval schedules (7.5 s, 15 s, 30 s, and 480 s). Elapsed session time was held constant while food density was manipulated via a presession feeding. Changes in food density altered the form of the variable-interval response function, independently of elapsed session time. In Experiment 2, 8 rats responded on the same series of variable-interval schedules as in Experiment 1, but food density was held constant and elapsed session time was manipulated via the use of timeout periods. The results revealed no evidence for an effect of elapsed session time independent of food density. The present results extend a recent analysis of the variable-interval response function by Dougan, Kuh, and Vink (1993) by identifying food density as an important factor determining the form of the function. The present results also help clarify the controversy over the correct empirical form of the variable-interval response function by further defining the variables responsible for differences in the form of that function.
以往研究在可变间隔时间表(可变间隔反应函数)上考察反应率与强化率之间的关系时,将已过去的时段时间与时段内食物密度的变化混为一谈。本实验试图分别操控这些因素,从而分离出它们对反应的影响。在实验1中,7只大鼠在一系列四个可变间隔时间表(7.5秒、15秒、30秒和480秒)上按压杠杆获取食物。已过去的时段时间保持恒定,而食物密度通过时段前喂食进行操控。食物密度的变化改变了可变间隔反应函数的形式,与已过去的时段时间无关。在实验2中,8只大鼠在与实验1相同的一系列可变间隔时间表上做出反应,但食物密度保持恒定,已过去的时段时间通过使用暂停期进行操控。结果显示,没有证据表明已过去的时段时间在与食物密度无关时会产生影响。本研究结果扩展了Dougan、Kuh和Vink(1993)最近对可变间隔反应函数的分析,确定了食物密度是决定该函数形式的一个重要因素。本研究结果还通过进一步明确导致该函数形式差异的变量,有助于澄清关于可变间隔反应函数正确经验形式的争议。