Sanger D J, Blackman D E
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1975 Aug;194(2):343-50.
Three rats were exposed to a variable-interval (VI) schedule of food reinforcement and three were exposed to the same VI schedule but with the added constraint that reinforcement could follow only a response which occurred at least 5 seconds after the preceding response. The rats exposed to this pacing requirement responded at considerably lower rates, but obtained only slightly fewer reinforcers than those exposed to the simple VI schedule. The effects of d-amphetamine were found to be dependent on the schedule which maintained behavior. This drug produced a dose-related decrease in rates of responding maintained by the unpaced VI schedule but a dose-related increase in the much lower rates maintained by the paced VI schedule. The effects of chlordiazepoxide were not so clearly schedule-dependent although there were some differences between the effects of this drug on responding maintained by the two schedules. These results support the view that the effects of d-amphetamine depend critically on the rate of the response under investigation, but this does not appear to be the case for chlordiazepoxide.
三只大鼠接受了可变间隔(VI)食物强化程序,另外三只大鼠接受相同的VI程序,但增加了一个限制条件,即强化只能在比前一次反应至少晚5秒出现的反应之后发生。受到这种节奏要求的大鼠反应率显著降低,但获得的强化物仅比接受简单VI程序的大鼠略少。发现右旋苯丙胺的效果取决于维持行为的程序。这种药物使无节奏VI程序维持的反应率呈剂量相关下降,但使有节奏VI程序维持的低得多的反应率呈剂量相关上升。氯氮卓的效果不太明显地依赖于程序,尽管这种药物对两种程序维持的反应的影响存在一些差异。这些结果支持这样一种观点,即右旋苯丙胺的效果关键取决于所研究反应的速率,但氯氮卓似乎并非如此。