Suppr超能文献

99锝-六甲基丙二胺肟白细胞扫描的计算机辅助解读比肉眼解读更好吗?

Is computer-aided interpretation of 99Tcm-HMPAO leukocyte scans better than the naked eye?

作者信息

Almer S, Peters A M, Ekberg S, Franzén L, Granerus G, Ström M

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.

出版信息

Nucl Med Commun. 1995 Apr;16(4):290-8. doi: 10.1097/00006231-199504000-00161.

Abstract

In order to compare visual interpretation of inflammation detected by leukocyte scintigraphy with that of different computer-aided quantification methods, 34 patients (25 with ulcerative colitis and 9 with endoscopically verified non-inflamed colonic mucosa), were investigated using 99Tcm-hexamethylpropyleneamine oxime (99Tcm-HMPAO) leukocyte scintigraphy and colonoscopy with biopsies. Scintigrams were obtained 45 min and 4 h after the injection of labelled cells. Computer-generated grading of seven colon segments using four different methods was performed on each scintigram for each patient. The same segments were graded independently using a 4-point visual scale. Endoscopic and histological inflammation were scored on 4-point scales. At 45 min, a positive correlation was found between endoscopic and scan gradings in individual colon segments when using visual grading and three of the four computer-aided methods (Spearman's rs = 0.30-0.64, P < 0.001). Histological grading correlated with visual grading and with two of the four computer-aided methods at 45 min (rs = 0.42-0.54, P < 0.001). At 4 h, all grading methods correlated positively with both endoscopic and histological assessment. The correlation coefficients were, in all but one instance, highest for the visual grading. As an inter-observer comparison to assess agreement between the visual gradings of two nuclear physicians, 14 additional patients (9 ulcerative colitis, 5 infectious enterocolitis) underwent leukocyte scintigraphy. Agreement assessed using kappa statistics was 0.54 at 45 min (P < 0.001). Separate data concerning the presence/absence of active inflammation showed a high kappa value (0.74, P < 0.001). Our results showed that a simple scintigraphic scoring system based on assessment using the human eye reflects colonic inflammation at least as well as computer-aided grading, and that highly correlated results can be achieved between different investigators.

摘要

为了比较白细胞闪烁扫描检测到的炎症的视觉解读与不同计算机辅助定量方法的结果,对34例患者(25例溃疡性结肠炎患者和9例经内镜证实结肠黏膜无炎症的患者)进行了99锝-六甲基丙烯胺肟(99Tcm-HMPAO)白细胞闪烁扫描和结肠镜活检检查。在注射标记细胞后45分钟和4小时获取闪烁扫描图像。对每位患者的每张闪烁扫描图像,使用四种不同方法对七个结肠段进行计算机生成分级。对相同的结肠段使用4分视觉量表进行独立分级。内镜和组织学炎症采用4分量表评分。在45分钟时,当使用视觉分级和四种计算机辅助方法中的三种时,在各个结肠段的内镜和扫描分级之间发现正相关(Spearman相关系数rs = 0.30 - 0.64,P < 0.001)。组织学分级在45分钟时与视觉分级以及四种计算机辅助方法中的两种相关(rs = 0.42 - 0.54,P < 0.001)。在4小时时,所有分级方法与内镜和组织学评估均呈正相关。除一个实例外,在所有情况下,视觉分级的相关系数最高。作为评估两位核医学医师视觉分级之间一致性的观察者间比较,另外14例患者(9例溃疡性结肠炎,5例感染性小肠结肠炎)接受了白细胞闪烁扫描。使用kappa统计量评估的45分钟时的一致性为0.54(P < 0.001)。关于是否存在活动性炎症的单独数据显示kappa值较高(0.74,P < 0.001)。我们的结果表明,基于肉眼评估的简单闪烁扫描评分系统反映结肠炎症的效果至少与计算机辅助分级一样好,并且不同研究者之间可以获得高度相关的结果。

相似文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验