Trappe H J, Pfitzner P, Heintze J, Kielblock B, Wenzlaff P, Fieguth H G, Panning B, Lichtlen P R
Abteilung Kardiologie, Medizinsche Hochschule Hannover.
Z Kardiol. 1995 May;84(5):385-93.
Today, we are facing an exponential increase in implantation of cardioverter defibrillators (ICD). The intraoperative and follow-up results are reported in 105 patients (pts) with ventricular tachyarrythmias who underwent ICD implantation in the catheterization laboratory. Fifty-seven pts (54%) hat their first ICD implant (G 1), whereas 46 pts (44%) underwent pulse generator replacement or electrode revision (2 pts, 2%) (G 2). In all pts, ICD implant or pulse generator replacement was performed under general anesthesia from the beginning. In 57/58 pts (98%) in G 1, ICD implantation was possible with a mean defibrillation threshold (DFT) of 13 +/- 8 joules. One patient hat a DFT of > 25 joules and ICD implantation was not achieved. This patient underwent epicardial lead implantation 1 day later. One patient in G 1 had a vessel rupture (v. subclavia) intraoperatively. During a mean follow-up of 5 +/- 2 (< 1-13) months, three pts (3%) died from congestive heart failure, 2, 4 and 6 months after device implantation. An infection occurred in 1 patient in G 2, 3 months after generator replacement. Our data show that in the majority of patients ICD implantation in the cath-lab is possible, safe, and the complication rate is low. Therefore, ICD implantation in the cath-lab can generally be recommended.
如今,我们正面临着心脏复律除颤器(ICD)植入数量呈指数级增长的情况。本文报告了105例患有室性心律失常的患者在导管室接受ICD植入的术中及随访结果。57例患者(54%)首次植入ICD(G1组),而46例患者(44%)接受了脉冲发生器更换或电极修复(2例,2%)(G2组)。所有患者从一开始就接受全身麻醉下的ICD植入或脉冲发生器更换手术。在G1组的57/58例患者(98%)中,ICD植入成功,平均除颤阈值(DFT)为13±8焦耳。1例患者DFT>25焦耳,未成功植入ICD。该患者于1天后接受了心外膜导线植入。G1组有1例患者术中发生血管破裂(锁骨下静脉)。在平均5±2(<1-13)个月的随访期间,3例患者(3%)在设备植入后2、4和6个月死于充血性心力衰竭。G2组有1例患者在发生器更换后3个月发生感染。我们的数据表明,在大多数患者中,在导管室植入ICD是可行、安全的,且并发症发生率低。因此,一般可推荐在导管室植入ICD。