Suppr超能文献

术中心肌缺血的检测——心室功能减退患者心电图、心肌代谢及血流动力学测量方法的比较

Detection of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia--a comparison among electrocardiographic, myocardial metabolic, and haemodynamic measurements in patients with reduced ventricular function.

作者信息

Hall R I, O'Regan N, Gardner M

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Anaesth. 1995 Jun;42(6):487-94. doi: 10.1007/BF03011686.

Abstract

This study determined the sensitivity and specificity of haemodynamic and ECG monitors to detect the development of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia utilizing myocardial lactate production as the standard. In 29 patients with reduced ejection fraction (0.27-0.50) undergoing coronary artery revascularization, measurements were made at the awake, post-induction, post-intubation, first skin incision, post-sternotomy, pre-protamine, immediately post-cardiopulmonary bypass, and skin suture intervals. At each interval, measurement of a haemodynamic profile (including pulmonary artery occlusion (PAOP) and central venous (CVP) pressures, heart rate, and pressure rate quotient); myocardial lactate extraction and flux; changes in ST segments in ECG leads, V5 and II utilizing a Siemens 1280 intraoperative monitor, and a Marquette 8500 Holter monitor utilizing leads V5, V2, and AVF were made. "Ischaemia" was considered to be present when myocardial lactate production (MLP) occurred, PAOP or CVP increased by 5 mmHg above the baseline value, the pressure rate quotient was < 1, or ST segment deviation (> 1 mm) occurred in any lead for > 1 min. Variables positive when MLP was positive were the pressure rate quotient (sensitivity 32.8%, specificity 71.9%), CVP (sensitivity 10.9%, specificity 92.6%), and PAOP (sensitivity 1.6%, specificity 99.2%). Holter monitoring had a 100% positive predictive value but poor sensitivity (1.6%). The ECG (Lead V5 + II) measures of ischaemia were insensitive (17.5%) and relatively non-specific (87.7%). We conclude that, in this patient group and using myocardial lactate production as the standard, the pressure rate quotient, elevations in CVP or PAOP, or ST segment changes are insensitive measures of intraoperative myocardial ischaemia.

摘要

本研究以心肌乳酸生成作为标准,确定了血流动力学监测仪和心电图监测仪检测术中心肌缺血发生情况的敏感性和特异性。对29例射血分数降低(0.27 - 0.50)且正在接受冠状动脉血运重建术的患者,在清醒、诱导后、插管后、首次皮肤切开、胸骨切开后、鱼精蛋白注射前、体外循环后即刻以及皮肤缝合时进行测量。在每个时间点,测量血流动力学参数(包括肺动脉闭塞压(PAOP)和中心静脉压(CVP)、心率以及压力心率商);心肌乳酸摄取和通量;使用西门子1280型术中监测仪测量心电图导联V5和II的ST段变化,以及使用马奎特8500型动态心电图监测仪测量导联V5、V2和AVF的变化。当出现心肌乳酸生成(MLP)、PAOP或CVP较基线值升高5 mmHg以上、压力心率商<1或任何导联ST段偏移(>1 mm)持续>1分钟时,即认为存在“缺血”。当MLP为阳性时呈阳性的变量有压力心率商(敏感性32.8%,特异性71.9%)、CVP(敏感性10.9%,特异性92.6%)以及PAOP(敏感性1.6%,特异性99.2%)。动态心电图监测的阳性预测值为100%,但敏感性较差(1.6%)。心电图(导联V5 + II)对缺血的测量不敏感(17.5%)且相对缺乏特异性(87.7%)。我们得出结论,在该患者群体中且以心肌乳酸生成作为标准时,压力心率商、CVP或PAOP升高以及ST段变化对术中心肌缺血的测量并不敏感。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验