McAlpine L, Parry J V, Shanson D, Mortimer P P
Hepatitis and Retrovirus Laboratory, PHLS Virus Reference Division, Central Public Health Laboratory, London.
J Clin Pathol. 1995 May;48(5):490-3. doi: 10.1136/jcp.48.5.490.
The sensitivity of 12 commonly used anti-HIV-1/HIV-2 enzyme immunoassays was evaluated. The assays, each of which utilises at least one synthetic HIV antigen, were tested against a panel of 1092 specimens previously designated anti-HIV positive. In a total of 13 104 tests there were eight false negative results attributable to assay insensitivity: three were on two serum samples collected close to seroconverison and five on another serum specimen. These eight false negative results arose in seven different assays. Five other false results were attributable to technical error. This false negativity rate indicates that all of the assays performed adequately and leads to an estimate of one false negative result in a thousand tests in routine diagnostic practice. Because of the antigenic heterogeneity of HIV strains, similar evaluations would be required in several regions before this satisfactory level of sensitivity in anti-HIV assays incorporating synthetic antigens could be said to be universal.
对12种常用的抗HIV-1/HIV-2酶免疫测定法的敏感性进行了评估。这些测定法每种都至少使用一种合成HIV抗原,针对一组先前被指定为抗HIV阳性的1092份标本进行了检测。在总共13104次检测中,有8例假阴性结果归因于检测不敏感:3例出现在两份接近血清转化时采集的血清样本上,5例出现在另一份血清标本上。这8例假阴性结果出现在7种不同的测定法中。另外5例假结果归因于技术错误。这种假阴性率表明所有测定法表现良好,在常规诊断实践中估计每一千次检测会出现一例假阴性结果。由于HIV毒株的抗原异质性,在合成抗原抗HIV测定法达到这种令人满意的敏感性水平被认为具有普遍性之前,需要在多个地区进行类似评估。