Suppr超能文献

[等候名单——官方数字的可信度如何?骨科手术科室等候名单的评估]

[Waiting lists--how valid are the official numbers? Evaluation of a waiting list at a department of orthopedic surgery].

作者信息

Brink O, Jakobsen B W, Jensen J

机构信息

Ortopaedkirurgisk afdeling, Arhus Amtssygehus.

出版信息

Ugeskr Laeger. 1995 Jun 26;157(26):3758-62.

PMID:7631452
Abstract

With increasing waiting lists for admission to hospital, the aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of an orthopaedic waiting list. Questionnaires were sent to every patient listed as waiting for more than three months. The questionnaire addressed the current symptoms and the current need for surgical treatment. In case of no reply, a further evaluation was done before eventual removal from the waiting list. Of 809 questionnaires mailed, replies were received from 409. A total of 376 were removed from the list, including 111 due to registration errors in the central data base. This study has shown how the indication for operation changes during the waiting period but also that information from data bases can be most unreliable. We find the reasons so general, that we recommend a corresponding evaluation of other waiting lists. Altogether, today's waiting list is faulty and thus provides a wrong basis for management.

摘要

随着医院入院等候名单的不断增加,本研究的目的是调查骨科等候名单的可靠性。问卷被发送给每一位等候超过三个月的患者。问卷涉及当前症状和当前手术治疗需求。若未收到回复,则在最终将其从等候名单中删除之前进行进一步评估。在邮寄的809份问卷中,收到了409份回复。共有376人从名单中被删除,其中111人是由于中央数据库中的登记错误。这项研究表明了手术指征在等候期间是如何变化的,同时也表明数据库中的信息可能极不可靠。我们发现这些原因非常普遍,因此建议对其他等候名单进行相应评估。总体而言,如今的等候名单存在缺陷,从而为管理提供了错误的依据。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验