Kubes P, Reinhardt P H, Payne D, Woodman R C
Department of Medical Physiology, University of Calgary Medical Center, Alberta, Canada.
Am J Physiol. 1995 Jul;269(1 Pt 1):G34-41. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.1995.269.1.G34.
The overproduction of nitric oxide in the small bowel has been invoked as a cytotoxic event in the vascular, mucosal, and whole organ dysfunction associated with inflammation. We assessed whether exogenous administration of nitric oxide in the form of nitric oxide donors (CAS 754, SIN-1) could cause microvascular and mucosal barrier dysfunction in vivo or epithelial and endothelial cell permeability alterations and cell injury in vitro. Increasing concentrations of CAS 754 or SIN-1 were infused locally into autoperfused segments of cat ileum at 30-min intervals. Baseline epithelial permeability (blood-to-lumen clearance of 51Cr-EDTA) was not affected by CAS 754, whereas vascular protein clearance was reduced. The latter effect could almost entirely be explained by a decrease in intestinal capillary hydrostatic pressure. Therefore, in some experiments venous pressure was elevated and the microvascular reflection coefficient for total proteins was estimated at filtration-independent rates. This direct measurement of microvascular permeability was unaffected by exogenous nitric oxide. CAS 754 did not increase permeability across monolayers of endothelial or epithelial cells and did not cause cell injury. Next, we assessed the possibility that excess nitric oxide may be detrimental, but only in inflamed intestine, by infusing CAS 754 with platelet-activating factor; the latter directly increases microvascular and mucosal permeability. CAS 754 did not exacerbate but rather reduced platelet-activating factor-induced rise in microvascular and mucosal permeability. These results suggest that high concentrations of nitric oxide do not cause breakdown of mucosal or microvascular barrier integrity under normal or inflammatory conditions.
小肠中一氧化氮的过度产生被认为是与炎症相关的血管、黏膜及整个器官功能障碍中的一种细胞毒性事件。我们评估了以一氧化氮供体(CAS 754、SIN-1)形式外源性给予一氧化氮是否会在体内引起微血管和黏膜屏障功能障碍,或在体外引起上皮细胞和内皮细胞通透性改变及细胞损伤。以30分钟的间隔将浓度递增的CAS 754或SIN-1局部注入猫回肠的自身灌注节段。CAS 754不影响基线上皮通透性(51Cr-EDTA的血至腔清除率),而血管蛋白清除率降低。后一种效应几乎完全可以用肠毛细血管静水压的降低来解释。因此,在一些实验中升高静脉压,并以与滤过无关的速率估计总蛋白的微血管反射系数。这种微血管通透性的直接测量不受外源性一氧化氮的影响。CAS 754不会增加内皮细胞或上皮细胞单层的通透性,也不会引起细胞损伤。接下来,我们通过将CAS 754与血小板活化因子一起注入,评估了过量一氧化氮可能有害,但仅在炎症肠中有害的可能性;后者直接增加微血管和黏膜通透性。CAS 754不会加剧而是降低了血小板活化因子引起的微血管和黏膜通透性升高。这些结果表明,在正常或炎症条件下,高浓度的一氧化氮不会导致黏膜或微血管屏障完整性的破坏。