Suppr超能文献

支气管肺泡灌洗液体中淋巴细胞的免疫表型分析。一种新的流式细胞术方法与标准免疫过氧化物酶技术的比较

Immunophenotyping of lymphocytes in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. A new flow cytometric method vs standard immunoperoxidase technique.

作者信息

Thomas M, von Eiff M, Brandt B, Heinecke A, van de Loo J

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Westfälische-Wilhelms Universität, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

Chest. 1995 Aug;108(2):464-9. doi: 10.1378/chest.108.2.464.

Abstract

Characterizing lymphocyte subsets in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) by flow cytometry (FC) proper gating of the lymphocyte subpopulation being analyzed is crucial. In order to test lymphocyte gate quality for the first time we used a DNA-dye to evaluate plasmamembrane integrity and thus to mark off fluorescent but not DNA-containing particles (eg, debris). A comparative prospective study between this newly developed FC technique and a standard peroxidase anti-peroxidase (PAP) method was performed. Samples of BALF from 50 patients with various pulmonary diseases were examined. After determination of the total cell yield, a differential cell count was performed. Subsequently, the immunophenotype of pan T lymphocyte CD3-, T-helper lymphocyte CD4-, and T-suppressor lymphocyte CD8-positive lymphocyte subsets was assessed with FC as well as with the PAP method. Both methods showed excellent correlation (CD3: r = 0.81; CD4: r = 0.97; CD8: r = 0.96; p < 0.05, respectively). Comparing the mean +/- SEM, FC tends to overestimate CD3+ cells (90.6 +/- 1.0% vs 85.8 +/- 1.3%). For CD4 (45.0 +/- 3.4% vs 44.4 +/- 3.4%) and CD8 (48.1 +/- 3.5% vs 46.7 +/- 3.5%), there was good agreement. In a clinical setting, the reliability of both methods was equivalent, and FC using a DNA-dye to test lymphocyte gate quality offered a rapid and reliable determination of lymphocyte subsets in BAL.

摘要

通过流式细胞术(FC)对支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)中的淋巴细胞亚群进行特征分析时,对所分析的淋巴细胞亚群进行正确设门至关重要。为了首次测试淋巴细胞设门质量,我们使用一种DNA染料来评估质膜完整性,从而区分荧光但不含DNA的颗粒(如碎片)。我们对这种新开发的FC技术与标准过氧化物酶抗过氧化物酶(PAP)方法进行了一项比较前瞻性研究。对50例患有各种肺部疾病的患者的BALF样本进行了检查。在确定总细胞产量后,进行了细胞分类计数。随后,用FC以及PAP方法评估了全T淋巴细胞CD3、辅助性T淋巴细胞CD4和抑制性T淋巴细胞CD8阳性淋巴细胞亚群的免疫表型。两种方法均显示出极好的相关性(CD3:r = 0.81;CD4:r = 0.97;CD8:r = 0.96;p均< 0.05)。比较平均值±标准误,FC倾向于高估CD3 +细胞(90.6±1.0%对85.8±1.3%)。对于CD4(45.0±3.4%对44.4±3.4%)和CD8(48.1±3.5%对46.7±3.5%),一致性良好。在临床环境中,两种方法的可靠性相当,并且使用DNA染料测试淋巴细胞设门质量的FC能够快速可靠地测定BAL中的淋巴细胞亚群。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验