Lockwood T
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Sep;96(3):603-15. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199509000-00012.
Modern abdominoplasty techniques were developed in the 1960s. The advent of liposuction has reduced the need for classic abdominoplasty and allowed more aesthetic sculpting of the entire trunk. However, the combination of significant truncal liposuction and classic abdominoplasty is not recommended due to the increased risk of complications. Although the surgical principles of classic abdominoplasty certainly have stood the test of time, they are based on two theoretical assumptions that may be proved to be inaccurate. The first assumption is that wide direct undermining to costal margins is essential for abdominal flap advancement. In fact, discontinuous undermining allows effective loosening of the abdominal flap while preserving vascular perforators. The second inaccurate assumption is that with aging and weight fluctuations (including pregnancy), abdominal skin relaxation occurs primarily in the vertical direction from the xiphoid to the pubis. This is true in the lower abdomen, but in most patients a strong superficial fascial system adherence to the linea alba in the epigastrium limits vertical descent. Epigastric laxity frequently results from a progressive horizontal loosening due to relaxation of the tissue along the lateral trunk. Experience with the lower-body lift procedure has shown that significant lateral truncal skin resection results in epigastric tightening. In these patients, the ideal abdominoplasty pattern would resect as much or more laterally than centrally, leading to more natural abdominal contours. Fifty patients who underwent high-lateral-tension abdominoplasty with and without significant truncal liposuction and other aesthetic procedures were followed for 4 to 16 months. The primary indication for surgery was moderate to severe laxity of abdominal skin and muscle with or without truncal fat deposits. Complication rates were equal to or less than those of historical controls and did not increase with significant adjunctive liposuction. The key technical elements of this procedure include direct undermining limited to the paramedian area, discontinuous undermining to costal margins and flanks as needed, skin resection pattern with significant lateral resection and highest-tension wound closure placed laterally, superficial fascial system repair with permanent sutures along the entire incision, and liberal use of adjunctive liposuction in the upper abdomen and the lateral and posterior trunk.
现代腹壁成形术技术是在20世纪60年代发展起来的。吸脂术的出现减少了经典腹壁成形术的需求,并允许对整个躯干进行更美观的塑形。然而,由于并发症风险增加,不建议将大量躯干吸脂术与经典腹壁成形术联合使用。尽管经典腹壁成形术的手术原则确实经受住了时间的考验,但它们基于两个理论假设,而这两个假设可能被证明是不准确的。第一个假设是,广泛直接潜行分离至肋缘对于推进腹部皮瓣至关重要。事实上,间断潜行分离在保留血管穿支的同时能有效松解腹部皮瓣。第二个不准确的假设是,随着年龄增长和体重波动(包括怀孕),腹部皮肤松弛主要发生在从剑突到耻骨的垂直方向。在下腹部确实如此,但在大多数患者中,上腹部的表浅筋膜系统与白线紧密相连限制了垂直下移。上腹部松弛通常是由于沿躯干外侧组织松弛导致的渐进性水平松弛所致。下半身提升手术的经验表明,大量切除躯干外侧皮肤会导致上腹部收紧。在这些患者中,理想的腹壁成形术模式是外侧切除量与中央切除量相同或更多,从而形成更自然的腹部轮廓。对50例行高外侧张力腹壁成形术的患者进行了随访,这些患者有的进行了大量躯干吸脂术,有的未进行,同时还进行了其他美容手术,随访时间为4至16个月。手术的主要适应证是腹部皮肤和肌肉中度至重度松弛,伴有或不伴有躯干脂肪沉积。并发症发生率等于或低于历史对照,且不会因大量辅助吸脂术而增加。该手术的关键技术要素包括:直接潜行分离仅限于中线旁区域,根据需要间断潜行分离至肋缘和侧腹,采用大量外侧切除和最高张力伤口闭合置于外侧的皮肤切除模式,沿整个切口用永久缝线修复表浅筋膜系统,以及在上腹部、躯干外侧和后侧大量使用辅助吸脂术。