Karmarkar S, Bhatia S, Saleh E, DeDonato G, Taibah A, Russo A, Sanna M
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1995 Aug;104(8):591-5. doi: 10.1177/000348949510400801.
A retrospective analysis of 433 cholesteatoma cases, surgically treated at the Gruppo Otologico, Piacenza, Italy, over a 7-year period, is reported. The purpose of this study was to delineate actual indications for individualizing open and closed procedures and to compare their results as regards residual or recurrent disease and hearing. The total incidences of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma in the open cavity procedures were 10% and 2.38%, respectively, while the closed procedures showed higher incidences of residual and recurrent cholesteatoma: 31.22% and 11.16%, respectively. The problem of a persistently discharging cavity was encountered in only 1 case of an open procedure, while 2 patients had persistent otorrhea among the closed cavity cases. The hearing results, although slightly better in the closed procedures, were not significantly different from those in the open procedures.
本文报告了对意大利皮亚琴察Gruppo Otologico医院7年间手术治疗的433例胆脂瘤病例的回顾性分析。本研究的目的是明确开放手术和闭合手术个体化的实际适应证,并比较它们在残余或复发性疾病及听力方面的结果。开放术式中残余和复发性胆脂瘤的总发生率分别为10%和2.38%,而闭合术式中残余和复发性胆脂瘤的发生率更高,分别为31.22%和11.16%。开放手术中仅1例出现持续流脓的术腔问题,而闭合术腔病例中有2例患者存在持续性耳漏。听力结果方面,尽管闭合手术稍好,但与开放手术相比无显著差异。