Suppr超能文献

营养不良大鼠跳跃、双向穿梭箱和压杆回避反应的习得与消退:电击强度的影响

Acquisition and extinction of jumping, two-way shuttle-box and bar press avoidance responses in malnourished rats: effects of shock intensity.

作者信息

Almeida S S, de-Oliveira L M

机构信息

Laboratório de Nutrição e Comportamento, Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Brasil.

出版信息

Braz J Med Biol Res. 1994 Oct;27(10):2443-52.

PMID:7640636
Abstract
  1. In order to investigate the role of avoidance response and shock intensity in avoidance learning in malnourished rats, three avoidance responses (jumping, two-way shuttle-box and bar press) and three shock intensities (0.4, 0.6 and 1.0 mA) were used. Independent groups of 6 rats were used for each response topography and shock intensity. 2. Malnourished male Wistar rats were suckled by mothers fed a 12% casein diet during the lactation period (0-21 days of age) while the mothers of well-nourished controls received a 25% casein diet. After weaning (21st day), all animals received a commercial lab chow diet until 70 days of age, when the avoidance training started. 3. Malnutrition did not affect the acquisition of the avoidance response, but malnourished groups required more trials to extinguish jumping and two-way shuttle-box. During the acquisition phase all animals learned the jump response faster in comparison to bar press and shuttle-box avoidance responses. Both groups in the acquisition phase responded faster with 1.0 mA when compared to lower intensities (0.6 and 0.4 mA). The malnourished animals showed lower latency of avoidance in the jumping response when compared with well-nourished animals. During the extinction phase there was a significant effect of diet, response topography and shock intensity in the latency to respond and trials to criterion. The increased resistance to extinction in malnourished rats was particularly evident with 1.0 mA in the two-way shuttle-box response. 4. These results suggest that contradictory data related to the acquisition of the avoidance response in malnourished animals cannot be attributed to response topography or variations in shock intensity. Furthermore, our results also indicate that resistance to extinction and latency to respond are appropriate parameters for detecting differences between well-nourished and malnourished animals.
摘要
  1. 为了研究回避反应和电击强度在营养不良大鼠回避学习中的作用,采用了三种回避反应(跳跃、双向穿梭箱和压杆)以及三种电击强度(0.4、0.6和1.0毫安)。每种反应形式和电击强度均使用6只大鼠的独立组。2. 营养不良的雄性Wistar大鼠在哺乳期(0至21日龄)由喂食12%酪蛋白饮食的母鼠哺乳,而营养良好的对照组母鼠则接受25%酪蛋白饮食。断奶后(第21天),所有动物均接受商业实验室饲料饮食,直至70日龄开始回避训练。3. 营养不良并未影响回避反应的习得,但营养不良组需要更多试验来消除跳跃和双向穿梭箱反应。在习得阶段,与压杆和穿梭箱回避反应相比,所有动物学习跳跃反应的速度更快。在习得阶段,两组在1.0毫安时的反应均比低强度(0.6和0.4毫安)时更快。与营养良好的动物相比,营养不良的动物在跳跃反应中的回避潜伏期更短。在消退阶段,饮食、反应形式和电击强度对反应潜伏期和达到标准所需试验次数有显著影响。营养不良大鼠对消退的抵抗力增加在双向穿梭箱反应中1.0毫安时尤为明显。4. 这些结果表明,与营养不良动物回避反应习得相关的矛盾数据不能归因于反应形式或电击强度的变化。此外,我们的结果还表明,对消退的抵抗力和反应潜伏期是检测营养良好和营养不良动物之间差异的合适参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验