Burg J S, Burright R G, Donovick P J
Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Binghamton 13902-6000, USA.
Brain Inj. 1995 May-Jun;9(4):395-403. doi: 10.3109/02699059509005779.
Thirty adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI) (20 males and 10 females, mean age 40 years) and a non-injured control group (12 males and 13 females, mean age 41 years) were tested on 16 tests of attention including three tasks of the Gordon Diagnostic System (GDS), a relatively new set of attention tasks. No differences between groups were found on age or education. Both groups had estimated IQs in the average range. Performance data for the GDS are presented for the TBI and CON groups. Mild to moderate deficits of attention were seen in the TBI group relative to controls on the Vigilance and Distractibility tasks. No differences between groups were seen on the Standard Delay groups. Person product moment correlations suggested different patterns of relationships between the GDS tasks and other tests of attention for the TBI and CON groups. These results support the utility of the Vigilance and Distractibility tasks for assessment of attention in a mild to moderately injured population.
30名创伤性脑损伤(TBI)成人(20名男性和10名女性,平均年龄40岁)和一个未受伤的对照组(12名男性和13名女性,平均年龄41岁)接受了16项注意力测试,其中包括戈登诊断系统(GDS)的三项任务,这是一组相对较新的注意力任务。两组在年龄或教育程度上没有差异。两组的估计智商均在平均范围内。给出了TBI组和对照组GDS的表现数据。与对照组相比,TBI组在警觉性和注意力分散任务上存在轻度至中度的注意力缺陷。在标准延迟任务上,两组之间没有差异。Person积差相关表明,TBI组和对照组在GDS任务与其他注意力测试之间存在不同的关系模式。这些结果支持了警觉性和注意力分散任务在评估轻度至中度受伤人群注意力方面的实用性。