• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Convergent and divergent validity of the Gordon Diagnostic System in adults.

作者信息

Carlozzi Noelle E, Horner Michael David

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, 1101 East Tenth Street, Bloomington, IN 47405, United States.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;22(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.012. Epub 2006 Nov 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.012
PMID:17123776
Abstract

The present study examined the convergent and divergent validity of the Gordon Diagnostic System (GDS) as a measure of attention in adults by examining correlations between GDS scores and scores on other attentional and non-attentional measures in 77 veterans (4 women and 73 men) referred for neuropsychological evaluation. Scores on the GDS were neither significantly correlated with scores on other attentional nor non-attentional measures. Participants were then divided into two groups, those who scored lower (<1S.D. below the published normative mean) and higher on the GDS for the Vigilance and Distractibility tasks separately. Participants with lower GDS scores on the Vigilance task performed more poorly on the Trailmaking Test, Part B than those with higher GDS scores. There were no other group differences on tests of attentional or non-attentional functions. These results do not provide strong support for the convergent and divergent validity of the GDS as a measure of attention in adults.

摘要

相似文献

1
Convergent and divergent validity of the Gordon Diagnostic System in adults.
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Jan;22(1):37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2006.08.012. Epub 2006 Nov 22.
2
ADHD subtypes and co-occurring anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder: differences in Gordon diagnostic system and Wechsler working memory and processing speed index scores.注意缺陷多动障碍亚型与共病的焦虑、抑郁和对立违抗障碍:戈登诊断系统及韦氏工作记忆与加工速度指数得分的差异
J Atten Disord. 2009 May;12(6):540-50. doi: 10.1177/1087054708320402. Epub 2008 Jul 29.
3
Clinical validity and interpretation of the Gordon Diagnostic System in ADHD assessments.戈登诊断系统在注意力缺陷多动障碍评估中的临床效度及解读
Child Neuropsychol. 2001 Mar;7(1):32-41. doi: 10.1076/chin.7.1.32.3151.
4
Ruff 2 and 7 Selective Attention Test: normative data, discriminant validity and test-retest reliability in Greek adults.鲁夫2和7选择性注意力测试:希腊成年人的常模数据、区分效度和重测信度
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2007 Aug;22(6):773-85. doi: 10.1016/j.acn.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 20.
5
The Moss Attention Rating Scale for traumatic brain injury: further explorations of reliability and sensitivity to change.用于创伤性脑损伤的莫斯注意力评定量表:对信度和变化敏感性的进一步探索。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 May;89(5):966-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.031.
6
The d2 Test of attention: construct validity and extensions in scoring techniques.注意力的d2测试:结构效度及计分技术的扩展
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2004 May;10(3):392-400. doi: 10.1017/S135561770410307X.
7
A task to manipulate attentional load, set-shifting, and inhibitory control: convergent validity and test-retest reliability of the Parametric Go/No-Go Test.一项用于操纵注意力负荷、转换任务和抑制控制的任务:参数化Go/No-Go测试的聚合效度和重测信度
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007 Nov;29(8):842-53. doi: 10.1080/13803390601147611. Epub 2006 Mar 12.
8
Neuropsychological impairment and gender differences in HIV-1 infection.HIV-1感染中的神经心理损伤及性别差异
Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2008 Oct;62(5):494-502. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1819.2008.01841.x.
9
[Interest of a new instrument to assess cognition in schizophrenia: The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS)].[一种用于评估精神分裂症认知功能的新工具的价值:精神分裂症认知功能简短评估量表(BACS)]
Encephale. 2008 Dec;34(6):557-62. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2007.12.005. Epub 2008 Jul 9.
10
[The diagnostic value of tests for mental control].[心理控制测试的诊断价值]
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1993 Jun;24(3):105-9.