Suppr超能文献

阿替洛尔两种制剂(氨酰心安和天诺敏)的降压效果比较。

A comparison of antihypertensive effects between two formulations of atenolol: tenolol and tenormin.

作者信息

Chiang H T, Hou Z Y, Lee D K, Wu T L, Chen C Y

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Veterans General Hospital-Kaohsiung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 1995 May;55(5):366-70.

PMID:7641121
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Atenolol is a cardioselective beta-blocker. Tenolol is a new formulation of atenolol, with bioequivalence to the original atenolol (Tenormin). This study was designed to compare the antihypertensive effects between the two formulations of atenolol, Tenolol and Tenormin.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients, with mild to moderate hypertension untreated with any antihypertensive drugs, were recruited. They were randomized to receive two weeks of placebo, four weeks of Tenolol or Tenormin (100 mg once daily) and two weeks of placebo. Then the treatments were crossed over for four more weeks.

RESULTS

At two weeks five patients were excluded because their blood pressures (BP) were below 160/90 mmHg. The baseline BPs for the patients receiving Tenormin (162 +/- 18/97 +/- 8 mmHg) and Tenolol (164 +/- 17/97 +/- 9 mmHg) were not distinct. After two weeks of treatment with Tenormin or Tenolol, systolic BPs decreased by 12 +/- 11 mmHg and 13 +/- 14 mmHg, respectively (p < 0.01 for both formulations). Similarly the diastolic BPs decreased significantly (p < 0.01) by 7 +/- 9 mmHg and 7 +/- 10 mmHg, respectively. The hypotensive effects persisted at four weeks of treatment for both formulations. Reductions in systolic and diastolic BPs by treatment with Tenormin and Tenolol were not significantly different by two-way ANOVA analysis. There were no side effects in any patient throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The results indicate that the generic formulation of atenolol (Tenolol) has comparable antihypertensive effects as the original formulation (Tenormin).

摘要

背景

阿替洛尔是一种心脏选择性β受体阻滞剂。替诺洛尔是阿替洛尔的一种新剂型,与原阿替洛尔(心得安)具有生物等效性。本研究旨在比较阿替洛尔的两种剂型替诺洛尔和心得安的降压效果。

方法

招募了23例未使用任何降压药物治疗的轻至中度高血压患者。他们被随机分配接受两周的安慰剂治疗、四周的替诺洛尔或心得安治疗(每日一次,100毫克)以及两周的安慰剂治疗。然后治疗方案交叉进行四周。

结果

两周时,有5例患者因血压低于160/90 mmHg而被排除。接受心得安(162±18/97±8 mmHg)和替诺洛尔(164±17/97±9 mmHg)治疗的患者基线血压无明显差异。用心得安或替诺洛尔治疗两周后,收缩压分别下降了12±11 mmHg和13±14 mmHg(两种剂型p均<0.01)。同样,舒张压也分别显著下降(p<0.01),下降了7±9 mmHg和7±10 mmHg。两种剂型在治疗四周时降压效果持续存在。通过双向方差分析,心得安和替诺洛尔治疗导致的收缩压和舒张压降低无显著差异。在整个研究过程中,任何患者均未出现副作用。

结论

结果表明,阿替洛尔的通用剂型(替诺洛尔)与原剂型(心得安)具有相当的降压效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验