Hall J W, Grose J H
Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina Medical School, Chapel Hill 27599, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):847-52. doi: 10.1121/1.413511.
In the first phase of the study, detection thresholds were obtained in conditions that were associated with comodulation masking release (CMR), conditions that were associated with the masking-level difference (MLD), or conditions that were not associated with masking release (baseline conditions). In the second phase of the study, amplitude discrimination was determined for standard tones presented at sensation levels (SLs) 0-30 dB above the masked detection thresholds. Results indicated that, at matched SLs, amplitude discrimination was poorer under conditions of masking release than for baseline conditions, both for the MLD and for CMR. Implications of these results for models of masking release are discussed.
在研究的第一阶段,在与共调制掩蔽释放(CMR)相关的条件、与掩蔽级差(MLD)相关的条件或与掩蔽释放无关的条件(基线条件)下获得检测阈值。在研究的第二阶段,针对在高于掩蔽检测阈值0 - 30 dB的感觉水平(SL)下呈现的标准音调确定幅度辨别力。结果表明,在匹配的SL下,对于MLD和CMR,掩蔽释放条件下的幅度辨别力比基线条件下更差。讨论了这些结果对掩蔽释放模型的意义。