Trumble T E, Kahn U, Vanderhooft E, Bach A W
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.
J Hand Surg Am. 1995 May;20(3):367-72. doi: 10.1016/S0363-5023(05)80089-9.
Sixteen patients were evaluated retrospectively following grafting of an upper extremity peripheral nerve injury. In addition to the standard subjective muscle grading, the force of reinnervated muscle groups was quantitatively measured using force transducers, and reported relative to the contralateral side. Patients recovered a median motor grade of M3, which correlated to a 32% recovery of muscle force of the contralateral side. M3 and M4 motor grades encompassed a large range of actual muscle force: M3 correlated with a recovered force that ranged from 17% to 42%, M4 with a range of 66% to 79%. The percent force of motor recovery decreased significantly with longer delays to nerve grafting, even when controlling for the severity of the injury. Similarly, recovery of muscle force decreased when longer segments of nerve grafts were used. Testing the return of muscle strength after peripheral nerve injuries with a standardized objective system that compares function to the uninjured side enhances the sensitivity of evaluating nerve regeneration and provides a measurement system that can facilitate the comparison of different nerve repair techniques.
对16例上肢周围神经损伤移植术后的患者进行了回顾性评估。除了标准的主观肌肉分级外,还使用力传感器对重新支配的肌肉群的力量进行了定量测量,并相对于对侧进行报告。患者恢复的运动分级中位数为M3,这与对侧肌肉力量恢复32%相关。M3和M4运动分级涵盖了较大范围的实际肌肉力量:M3与17%至42%的恢复力量相关,M4与66%至79%的范围相关。即使在控制损伤严重程度的情况下,运动恢复的力量百分比也会随着神经移植延迟时间的延长而显著下降。同样,当使用更长节段的神经移植物时,肌肉力量的恢复也会下降。使用标准化的客观系统测试周围神经损伤后肌肉力量的恢复情况,该系统将功能与未受伤侧进行比较,提高了评估神经再生的敏感性,并提供了一个有助于比较不同神经修复技术的测量系统。