McDowell Brona C, Lowe Andrea S, Walsh Deirdre M, Baxter David G, Allen James M
Departments of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland UK Occupational Therapy and Physiotherapy, Biotherapeutics Research Group, University of Ulster, Jordanstown BT37 0QB, Northern Ireland UK.
Pain. 1995 Apr;61(1):27-32. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)00146-6.
The hypoalgesic effect of H-wave therapy (HWT) at various frequencies (2-60 Hz) was assessed using a standardised form of the submaximal effort tourniquet technique (SETT). Healthy human volunteers (n = 112; 56 men, 56 women) were required to attend on two occasions; on the first, baseline pain scores were obtained and on the second, 48 h later, subjects were randomly assigned to control, placebo or 1 of 5 H-wave treatment conditions. In the treatment groups 2 self-adhesive electrodes were attached to the ipsilateral Erb's point and just lateral to the spinous processes of C6/C7. H-wave stimulation commenced 10 min prior to pain induction and continued throughout the 12-min duration of the technique. In the placebo group electrodes were attached as normal but leads were connected to a dummy power output. Analysis of variance of the differences in visual analogue scale and McGill Pain Questionnaire scores showed no significant differences in the treatment groups compared to placebo or controls. These results do not provide convincing evidence for any hypoalgesic effects of HWT at the frequency parameters stated on the experimental model of pain used.
使用次最大用力止血带技术(SETT)的标准化形式评估了不同频率(2 - 60赫兹)的H波疗法(HWT)的痛觉减退效果。健康人类志愿者(n = 112;56名男性,56名女性)需要参加两次测试;第一次,获取基线疼痛评分,第二次,48小时后,受试者被随机分配到对照组、安慰剂组或5种H波治疗条件中的1种。在治疗组中,将两个自粘电极贴在同侧的Erb点以及C6/C7棘突外侧。在诱发疼痛前10分钟开始H波刺激,并在整个12分钟的技术过程中持续进行。在安慰剂组中,电极按常规方式粘贴,但导线连接到模拟电源输出。对视觉模拟量表和麦吉尔疼痛问卷评分差异的方差分析表明,与安慰剂组或对照组相比,治疗组没有显著差异。这些结果没有为在所用疼痛实验模型的频率参数下HWT的任何痛觉减退效果提供令人信服的证据。