Wuyts I J, Buekers M J
Department of Sport and Movement Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium.
Res Q Exerc Sport. 1995 Jun;66(2):105-15. doi: 10.1080/02701367.1995.10762218.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of visual and auditory concurrent models on the acquisition of a rhythmical synchronization task. Subjects attempted to synchronize a series of dance steps to the beat of two auditory rhythms. Subjects performed five trial blocks in one of four practice conditions: (a) audio-visual (auditory rhythms combined with a visual model), (b) audio-auditory (auditory rhythms combined with an auditory model), (c) auditory only (auditory rhythms with no model), and (d) visual only (no auditory rhythms but exposure to a visual model). Rhythmical timing and synchronization accuracy served as the dependent variables. Results revealed no practice condition learning differences for rhythmical timing. For synchronization accuracy, the audio-auditory group produced significantly lower error scores at acquisition, but no differences were found at retention. Apparently, the availability of models created an information dependency that resulted in a decrease of performance and, consequently, no group differences in retention.
本研究的目的是调查视觉和听觉并发模型对节奏同步任务习得的影响。受试者试图将一系列舞蹈动作与两种听觉节奏的节拍同步。受试者在四种练习条件之一中进行五个试验块:(a)视听(听觉节奏与视觉模型相结合),(b)听-听(听觉节奏与听觉模型相结合),(c)仅听觉(无模型的听觉节奏),以及(d)仅视觉(无听觉节奏但接触视觉模型)。节奏计时和同步准确性作为因变量。结果显示,在节奏计时方面,各练习条件下的学习没有差异。对于同步准确性,听-听组在习得时产生的错误分数显著更低,但在保持时未发现差异。显然,模型的可用性产生了一种信息依赖性,导致表现下降,因此在保持时没有组间差异。