• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国人和以色列人脑血管意外患者在洛温斯坦职业疗法认知评估(LOTCA)中的表现。

Performance of Americans and israelis with cerebrovascular accident on the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA).

作者信息

Cermak S A, Katz N, McGuire E, Greenbaum S, Peralta C, Maser-Flanagan V

机构信息

Boston University, Sargent College of Allied Health Professions, Department of Occupational Therapy, Massachusetts 02215, USA.

出版信息

Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Jun;49(6):500-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.6.500.

DOI:10.5014/ajot.49.6.500
PMID:7645662
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) measures the cognitive performance of persons with cerebrovascular accident (CVA). Although this assessment was developed and standardized in Israel, it is frequently used in the United States. The purpose of this study was to identify whether differences in performance on the LOTCA existed between Americans and Israelis who have had strokes. Additionally, this study was designed to compare the performance of persons with right CVA with the performance of persons with left CVA because the normative data for the LOTCA does not include separate information for these two groups.

METHOD

The LOTCA was administered to 25 Americans with CVA (19 right CVA and 6 left CVA) and 56 Israelis with CVA (26 right CVA and 30 left CVA).

RESULTS

On the majority of LOTCA subtests, there were no significant differences between American and Israeli subjects. Only one subtest, Orientation to Time, revealed significant differences between Americans and Israeli subjects both for subjects with right CVA and subjects with left CVA. Examination of subjects with right CVA versus subjects with left CVA also indicated few differences. Only one subtest, Pegboard Construction, revealed significant differences between subjects with right CVA and subjects with left CVA for both American and Israeli subjects.

CONCLUSION

The LOTCA is an appropriate tool for occupational therapists to use in assessing Americans who have had strokes. In addition, for the most part, the subtests of the LOTCA assess cognitive-perceptual abilities that are not specific to the right or left cerebral hemisphere.

摘要

目的

洛温斯坦认知作业疗法评定量表(LOTCA)用于测量脑血管意外(CVA)患者的认知表现。尽管该评估是在以色列开发并标准化的,但在美国也经常使用。本研究的目的是确定中风后的美国人和以色列人在LOTCA测试中的表现是否存在差异。此外,本研究旨在比较右侧CVA患者和左侧CVA患者的表现,因为LOTCA的常模数据并未包括这两组的单独信息。

方法

对25名美国CVA患者(19名右侧CVA和6名左侧CVA)和56名以色列CVA患者(26名右侧CVA和30名左侧CVA)进行LOTCA测试。

结果

在大多数LOTCA子测试中,美国和以色列受试者之间没有显著差异。只有一个子测试,即时间定向,显示右侧CVA受试者和左侧CVA受试者在美国和以色列受试者之间均存在显著差异。对右侧CVA受试者和左侧CVA受试者的检查也表明差异很少。只有一个子测试,即钉板结构测试,显示美国和以色列受试者中右侧CVA受试者和左侧CVA受试者之间存在显著差异。

结论

LOTCA是职业治疗师评估中风后美国人的合适工具。此外,在很大程度上,LOTCA的子测试评估的是并非特定于右侧或左侧大脑半球的认知感知能力。

相似文献

1
Performance of Americans and israelis with cerebrovascular accident on the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA).美国人和以色列人脑血管意外患者在洛温斯坦职业疗法认知评估(LOTCA)中的表现。
Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Jun;49(6):500-6. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.6.500.
2
Cultural factors affecting the differential performance of Israeli and Palestinian children on the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment.文化因素对以色列和巴勒斯坦儿童在 Loewenstein 职业治疗认知评估中表现差异的影响。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 May-Jun;31(3):656-63. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 11.
3
Psychometric properties of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment-Second Edition in Taiwanese persons with schizophrenia.台湾精神分裂症患者中洛温斯坦职业疗法认知评估第二版的心理测量特性
Am J Occup Ther. 2007 Jan-Feb;61(1):108-18. doi: 10.5014/ajot.61.1.108.
4
Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment (LOTCA) battery for brain-injured patients: reliability and validity.用于脑损伤患者的洛温斯坦认知作业疗法评估(LOTCA)成套测验:信度与效度
Am J Occup Ther. 1989 Mar;43(3):184-92. doi: 10.5014/ajot.43.3.184.
5
Validity of the Behavioral Inattention Test (BIT): relationships with functional tasks.
Am J Occup Ther. 1995 Jun;49(6):507-16. doi: 10.5014/ajot.49.6.507.
6
Clinical application of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment Battery-Second Edition in evaluating of cognitive function of Chinese patients with post-stroke aphasia.洛温斯坦认知功能作业疗法评定量表第二版在评估中国脑卒中后失语症患者认知功能中的临床应用
Chin Med Sci J. 2013 Sep;28(3):167-71. doi: 10.1016/s1001-9294(13)60043-7.
7
The usefulness of the Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognition Assessment in evaluating cognitive function in patients with stroke.洛温斯坦认知作业疗法评定在评估脑卒中患者认知功能方面的实用性。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2014;18(23):3665-72.
8
Construct validity and internal consistency reliability of the Loewenstein occupational therapy cognitive assessment (LOTCA).洛文斯顿作业疗法认知评估(LOTCA)的结构效度和内部一致性信度。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 11;18(1):184. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1776-x.
9
Reliability and internal consistency of the Danish version of Loewenstein Occupational Therapy Cognitive Assessment 2nd Edition (LOTCA-II/D).丹麦版洛温斯坦职业治疗认知评估第二版(LOTCA-II/D)的信度和内部一致性
Scand J Occup Ther. 2014 Nov;21(6):473-8. doi: 10.3109/11038128.2014.925504. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
10
Continued construct validation of the St. Marys CVA evaluation: Brunnstrom arm and hand stage ratings.
Am J Occup Ther. 1986 Aug;40(8):561-3. doi: 10.5014/ajot.40.8.561.

引用本文的文献

1
Usability Evaluation of a Distributed User Interface Application for Visuomotor Organization Assessment.分布式用户界面应用程序用于视动组织评估的可用性评估。
Methods Inf Med. 2020 Dec;59(S 02):e79-e89. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713086. Epub 2020 Sep 7.