Hwang S K, Park J S
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yonsei University, Wonju College of Medicine, Kangwon-Do, Republic of Korea.
Int Orthop. 1995;19(2):77-83. doi: 10.1007/BF00179964.
Two hundred and fourteen patients who had 270 cementless hip prostheses were followed for 2 to 8 years. PCA (Porous-Coated Monatomic), AML (Monatomic Medullary Locking) and HGP (Harris-Galante-Porous) femoral stems and acetabular cups were used without any preference for the prostheses. The overall clinical results were similar for the three prostheses with average Harris hip scores of 93, 93 and 91 respectively. Four PCA prostheses had radiological aseptic loosening and one was revised because of polyethylene wear. There was no loosening in the AML and HGP prostheses. Pain in the thigh, usually slight, occurred in 17% of AML, 21% of PCA and 19% of HGP prostheses. Five years after operation, radiological changes such as migration, calcar remodelling and radiolucent lines were the same for the 3 prostheses, but bony ingrowth was greater with the AML femoral stems.
214例接受了270个非骨水泥型髋关节假体置换的患者接受了2至8年的随访。使用了PCA(多孔涂层单原子)、AML(单原子髓内锁定)和HGP(哈里斯-加兰特-多孔)股骨柄及髋臼杯,对假体无任何偏好。三种假体的总体临床结果相似,平均哈里斯髋关节评分分别为93分、93分和91分。4个PCA假体出现了影像学无菌性松动,1个因聚乙烯磨损而翻修。AML和HGP假体未出现松动。17%的AML假体、21%的PCA假体和19%的HGP假体出现大腿疼痛,通常较轻。术后5年,三种假体的影像学改变如移位、股骨距重塑和透亮线相同,但AML股骨柄的骨长入情况更好。