Mayer E L
San Francisco Psychoanalytic Institute, Department of Psychiatry, University of California, USA.
J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 1995;43(1):17-38. doi: 10.1177/000306519504300105.
I suggest that two developmental lines contribute to the achievement of female gender identity. One is rooted in the phallic castration complex, and the other in primary femininity. Far from being mutually exclusive, the two comprise necessary aspects of every girl's progress toward becoming a woman. To that extent, every woman's analysis will include the analysis of compromise formations that emerge from both. In distinguishing clinical manifestations of each developmental line, I suggest that it may be useful to conceptualize primary femininity and the phallic castration complex as affect-defense configurations which incorporate two fundamentally different ideas about danger. In conflicts of primary femininity, danger is anticipated: anxiety is the signal for compromise formation, since what is actually possessed (the female genital) is valued and is therefore imagined as subject to danger. In the phallic castration complex, danger is imagined already to have occurred. Depressive affect becomes the primary motive for defense, based on a fantasy that what is valued (the male genital) has already been lost. This distinction may facilitate our efforts to specify exactly how recent revisions in theories of female development have explicit implications for practice.
我认为有两条发展路线有助于女性性别认同的形成。一条源于阴茎阉割情结,另一条源于原初女性特质。这两者并非相互排斥,而是每个女孩成长为女人过程中不可或缺的方面。在这个程度上,每个女性的分析都将包括对源自这两者的妥协形成的分析。在区分每条发展路线的临床表现时,我认为将原初女性特质和阴茎阉割情结概念化为情感防御结构可能是有用的,这些结构包含了两种关于危险的根本不同的观念。在原初女性特质的冲突中,危险是预期的:焦虑是妥协形成的信号,因为实际拥有的(女性生殖器)受到重视,因此被想象为处于危险之中。在阴茎阉割情结中,危险被想象为已经发生。抑郁情感成为防御的主要动机,其基础是一种幻想,即所珍视的(男性生殖器)已经失去。这种区分可能有助于我们努力确切说明女性发展理论的最新修订如何对实践产生明确影响。