Suppr超能文献

丙泊酚与芬太尼麻醉用于冠状动脉手术与瓣膜手术的比较。

Comparison of propofol and fentanyl anaesthesia in coronary artery versus valve surgery.

作者信息

Bell J, Sartain J, Wilkinson G A, Sherry K M

机构信息

Northern General Hospital, Sheffield.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 1995 Jul;50(7):644-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1995.tb15122.x.

Abstract

Total intravenous anaesthesia with propofol and fentanyl was used in 23 patients undergoing coronary artery and 16 patients undergoing valve surgery and the haemodynamic effects in the two groups were compared. Baseline values showed that the valve surgery group had a higher mean heart rate, pulmonary artery wedge pressure and pulmonary artery pressure and smaller mean stroke volume than the coronary artery surgery group. In both groups, heart rate, arterial pressure, pulmonary artery wedge pressure, pulmonary artery pressure and cardiac index decreased during surgery. In the valve surgery group there were greater percentage decreases in heart rate, mean arterial pressure and diastolic arterial pressure. Overall, propofol and moderate-dose fentanyl anaesthesia was no more detrimental to the haemodynamics in patients undergoing valve surgery when compared to those undergoing coronary artery surgery.

摘要

23例接受冠状动脉手术的患者和16例接受瓣膜手术的患者采用丙泊酚和芬太尼全静脉麻醉,并比较两组的血流动力学效应。基线值显示,瓣膜手术组的平均心率、肺动脉楔压和肺动脉压高于冠状动脉手术组,平均每搏量低于冠状动脉手术组。两组患者在手术过程中心率、动脉压、肺动脉楔压、肺动脉压和心脏指数均下降。瓣膜手术组心率、平均动脉压和舒张压的下降百分比更大。总体而言,与接受冠状动脉手术的患者相比,丙泊酚和中剂量芬太尼麻醉对接受瓣膜手术的患者血流动力学的损害并不更大。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验