Hager J C, Barman A A, Moideen A S, Chaudhry S S, Barman S A
Department of Surgery, Wyckoff Heights Medical Center, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Jun;3(3):291-2. doi: 10.1016/0967-2109(95)93878-s.
Use of valvulotomes in non-reversed venous conduits carries the potential of venous endothelial cell injury. Earlier studies have shown that there is a significant decrease in the number of endothelial cells present in the human saphenous vein when employing the circular (LeMaitre) valvulotome. The present study was performed to evaluate and compare the LeMaitre and modified Hall valvulotome techniques on vascular endothelial cells from human saphenous vein. The results of the present study indicate that while both valvulotomes caused a significant decrease in the number of endothelial cells, the modified Hall instrument was less damaging to the vascular endothelium than the LeMaitre valvulotome. These results suggest that the modified Hall valvulotome technique may be more beneficial in maintaining endothelial cell function when the use of a valvulotome is warranted.
在非逆行静脉管道中使用瓣膜刀存在静脉内皮细胞损伤的风险。早期研究表明,使用圆形(LeMaitre)瓣膜刀时,人隐静脉中存在的内皮细胞数量会显著减少。本研究旨在评估和比较LeMaitre瓣膜刀技术与改良Hall瓣膜刀技术对人隐静脉血管内皮细胞的影响。本研究结果表明,虽然两种瓣膜刀都会导致内皮细胞数量显著减少,但改良Hall器械对血管内皮的损伤比LeMaitre瓣膜刀小。这些结果表明,当有必要使用瓣膜刀时,改良Hall瓣膜刀技术可能更有利于维持内皮细胞功能。