• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国人对克林顿医疗计划的支持情况如何?

What happened to Americans' support for the Clinton health plan?

作者信息

Blendon R J, Brodie M, Benson J

机构信息

Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Summer;14(2):7-23. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.7.

DOI:10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.7
PMID:7657263
Abstract

Within a twelve-month period public support for the Clinton plan fell from 71 percent to 43 percent. The administration lost substantial support among two politically important groups--the elderly and Democrats. This outcome was brought on by a series of key strategic and substantive misjudgments by the administration in the choices that it made in the development of its plan. These particular decisions inadvertently reinforced the public's deeply held cynicism that although health care reform was needed, the government in Washington would not do it right and would ultimately leave the middle class worse off than it was before.

摘要

在十二个月的时间里,公众对克林顿计划的支持率从71%降至43%。政府在两个政治上很重要的群体——老年人和民主党人——中失去了大量支持。这一结果是由政府在制定计划过程中做出的一系列关键战略和实质性误判导致的。这些特定的决策无意中强化了公众根深蒂固的怀疑态度,即尽管需要医疗保健改革,但华盛顿的政府不会把它做好,最终会让中产阶级的处境比以前更糟。

相似文献

1
What happened to Americans' support for the Clinton health plan?美国人对克林顿医疗计划的支持情况如何?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1995 Summer;14(2):7-23. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.14.2.7.
2
Health reform impasse: the politics of American ambivalence toward government.医疗改革僵局:美国对政府矛盾态度的政治因素
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1993 Fall;18(3 Pt 2):629-55. doi: 10.1215/03616878-18-3-629.
3
The Clinton plan: what happened to the tough choices?克林顿计划:那些艰难抉择后来怎样了?
Health Aff (Millwood). 1994 Spring;13(1):147-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.13.1.147.
4
The Clinton presidency and health care reform.克林顿总统任期与医疗保健改革。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Summer;20(2):399-402. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-2-399.
5
Making the best of hard times: how the nation's economic circumstances shaped the public's embrace of health care reform.艰难时期的最佳选择:国家的经济状况如何塑造公众对医疗改革的接受度。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2011 Dec;36(6):989-1020. doi: 10.1215/03616878-1460560. Epub 2011 Sep 26.
6
The public's contribution to congressional gridlock on health care reform.公众对国会在医疗保健改革问题上陷入僵局所起的作用。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Summer;20(2):403-10. doi: 10.1215/03616878-20-2-403.
7
Harry and Louise go to Washington: political advertising and health care reform.哈利与露易丝进军华盛顿:政治广告与医疗保健改革
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Spring;21(1):35-68. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-1-35.
8
Liking Health Reform But Turned Off By Toxic Politics.支持医疗改革,但反感恶劣的政治手段。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2016 May 1;35(5):915-22. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2015.1313. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
9
Chronology of the birth and death of a health bill.一项医保法案的诞生与消亡年表。
J Health Care Finance. 1995 Spring;21(3):59-67.
10
Americans' political participation in the 1993-94 national health care reform debate.美国人在1993 - 1994年全国医疗保健改革辩论中的政治参与情况。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1996 Spring;21(1):99-128. doi: 10.1215/03616878-21-1-99.

引用本文的文献

1
"Our reach is wide by any corporate standard": how the tobacco industry helped defeat the Clinton health plan and why it matters now.“按照任何企业标准衡量,我们的影响力都很广泛”:烟草业如何帮助击败克林顿的健康计划,以及为何这在当下很重要。
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1174-88. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.179150. Epub 2010 May 13.
2
Trends in perceived cost as a barrier to medical care, 1991-1996.1991 - 1996年期间,将可感知成本视为医疗保健障碍的趋势。
Am J Public Health. 1999 Sep;89(9):1410-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.89.9.1410.
3
Must we choose between quality and cost containment?
我们必须在质量和成本控制之间做出选择吗?
Qual Health Care. 1996 Dec;5(4):223-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.4.223.
4
Whatever happened to politicians' concerns about the nation's uninsured?政客们对国家未参保者的担忧到底怎么了?
Am J Public Health. 1998 Mar;88(3):345-6. doi: 10.2105/ajph.88.3.345.
5
Osler meets the marketplace--speculations on the future of internal medicine in the 21st century.奥斯勒与市场——对21世纪内科医学未来的思考
Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc. 1996;107:249-60; discussion 260-2.